Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dealing with OP_IF and OP_NOTIF malleability

[Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 848 bytes --]

I meant not to use the OP_PUSH opcodes to do the push.

Does OP_0 give a zero length byte array?

Would this script return true?

OP_0
OP_PUSHDATA1 (length = 1, data = 0)
OP_EQUAL

The easiest definition is that OP_0 and OP_1 must be used to push the data
and not any other push opcodes.


On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Oleg Andreev <oleganza@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > One and zero should be defined as arrays of length one. Otherwise, it is
> still possible to mutate the transaction by changing the length of the
> array.
> >
> > They should also be minimally encoded but that is covered by previous
> rules.
>
> These two lines contradict each other. Minimally-encoded "zero" is an
> array of length zero, not one. I'd suggest defining this explicitly here as
> "IF/NOTIF argument must be either zero-length array or a single byte 0x01".
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1326 bytes --]