From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01104CB3 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:57:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (mail-io0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0241815D for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id l127so137797370iof.3 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:56:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=OGUFt6RrFobdH27+M+WR9pfVDtbIn5Wmy7hgpJdknok=; b=bv8u2gPSVyBlEP/TaDziMhXjLaKNYA27A+st26pAGf9QdGWX5OQk5EdtTygLgurIYi zOqAy1PiqYYyOtxvAdLEFiLC9hv1V8N2wvjm0z7KD2VmM5h2iKiqyTUaCEG4YkBA/dWW 9+5HNJIG1HpEF1WTLRR63ATtbIuUEBByzkWDs6G1nJ3A8dAK7z2A0nLDk098Md0qWyu/ PksRKi2nRWZxE5rjmfL0soDOBE36Q8KvRiNZu1QxydDW2vqNOsW8sxqqsuLONQaNYYaE VXkpWYds5ZO2Z53CeeN6X2WWyidFXk1ecO9atWQ35UxaX1LeWBt6g35vO9zQKmRAYjx3 3czQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=OGUFt6RrFobdH27+M+WR9pfVDtbIn5Wmy7hgpJdknok=; b=E34kyD/7BQ7iJO9JJcKC9f/ElJBbtPBa38VLm+ebKZMRMUbrRJ7fIqkjlxDm9Mk52/ srEXN60sVrubCkXRHBf3bqOkYW4GiQ9X7Sr3PgpSDKsdoAiWkUFii89kGHpjX6z+2nYD l4XDTKDUb4aTMj5bT+upaRs3Xb+V/fGs/Xl6byjxF7HJVsKwAkludLPY0pCTBRCO5wBM XM4fpYle2wZO0tTEaAves1pirQELmTtyDMXfMWISIbIx2roaqdZObnEV9Yg445l4e2iw fvocwVvjKLgnXYoTtUm3n8nTUxBcoAlb2BI/5a/PecXUE4x9OnpZadY0o0dH5zrTk7fU KReA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT3zGoAe71Nm2ZtzuYo2QqBFfVvyKV7LaEYOqg7e+qRhapV9VMZpJI91JyncEMjJNcUT3lBPiHso9hZBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.17.147 with SMTP id 19mr12585863ior.109.1456531018477; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:56:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.79.128.149 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:56:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:56:58 +0000 Message-ID: From: Tier Nolan To: Gregory Maxwell Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ff326f5fc2e052cb50df0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The first successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:57:03 -0000 --001a113ff326f5fc2e052cb50df0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > Why not use the single-show-signature scheme I came up with a while > back on the Bitcoin side to force the bitcoin side to reveal a private > key? > > > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2015-November/000344.html > Thanks for the info, I will give it a look. --001a113ff326f5fc2e052cb50df0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Gregory Maxwell <= ;greg@xiph.org> wrote:
Why not use the single-show-signature scheme I came up with a while
back on the Bitcoin side to force the bitcoin side to reveal a private
key?

http://lists.linux= foundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2015-November/000344.html

Thanks for the info= , I will give it a look.
--001a113ff326f5fc2e052cb50df0--