From: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] request BIP number for: "Support for Datastream Compression"
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:30:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE-z3OXgWCHL_3CDR-ACc7ojbLi7EavyObNa3s7hPUMGj_V2+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5642172C.701@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2479 bytes --]
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Peter Tschipper <peter.tschipper@gmail.com>
wrote:
> There are better ways of sending new blocks, that's certainly true but for
> sending historical blocks and seding transactions I don't think so. This
> PR is really designed to save bandwidth and not intended to be a huge
> performance improvement in terms of time spent sending.
>
If the main point is for historical data, then sticking to just blocks is
the best plan.
Since small blocks don't compress well, you could define a "cblocks"
message that handles multiple blocks (just concatenate the block messages
as payload before compression).
The sending peer could combine blocks so that each cblock is compressing at
least 10kB of block data (or whatever is optimal). It is probably worth
specifying a maximum size for network buffer reasons (either 1MB or 1 block
maximum).
Similarly, transactions could be combined together and compressed "ctxs".
The inv messages could be modified so that you can request groups of 10-20
transactions. That would depend on how much of an improvement compressed
transactions would represent.
More generally, you could define a message which is a compressed message
holder. That is probably to complex to be worth the effort though.
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Johnathan Corgan via bitcoin-dev <
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:58 PM, gladoscc via bitcoin-dev <
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I think 25% bandwidth savings is certainly considerable, especially for
>>> people running full nodes in countries like Australia where internet
>>> bandwidth is lower and there are data caps.
>>>
>>
>> This reinforces the idea that such trade-off decisions should be be
>> local and negotiated between peers, not a required feature of the network
>> P2P.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Johnathan Corgan
>> Corgan Labs - SDR Training and Development Services
>> http://corganlabs.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing listbitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.orghttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6099 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-10 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-09 19:18 [bitcoin-dev] request BIP number for: "Support for Datastream Compression" Peter Tschipper
2015-11-09 20:41 ` Johnathan Corgan
2015-11-09 21:04 ` Bob McElrath
2015-11-10 1:58 ` gladoscc
2015-11-10 5:40 ` Johnathan Corgan
2015-11-10 9:44 ` Tier Nolan
[not found] ` <5642172C.701@gmail.com>
2015-11-10 16:17 ` Peter Tschipper
2015-11-10 16:21 ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-11-10 16:30 ` Tier Nolan [this message]
2015-11-10 16:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-11-10 17:09 ` Peter Tschipper
2015-11-11 18:35 ` Peter Tschipper
2015-11-11 18:49 ` Marco Pontello
2015-11-11 19:05 ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-11-13 21:58 ` [bitcoin-dev] Block Compression (Datastream Compression) test results using the PR#6973 compression prototype Peter Tschipper
2015-11-18 14:00 ` [bitcoin-dev] More findings: " Peter Tschipper
2015-11-11 19:11 ` [bitcoin-dev] request BIP number for: "Support for Datastream Compression" Peter Tschipper
2015-11-28 14:48 ` [bitcoin-dev] further test results for : "Datastream Compression of Blocks and Tx's" Peter Tschipper
2015-11-29 0:30 ` Jonathan Toomim
2015-11-29 5:15 ` Peter Tschipper
[not found] ` <56421F1E.4050302@gmail.com>
2015-11-10 16:46 ` [bitcoin-dev] request BIP number for: "Support for Datastream Compression" Peter Tschipper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAE-z3OXgWCHL_3CDR-ACc7ojbLi7EavyObNa3s7hPUMGj_V2+A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tier.nolan@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox