There are better ways of sending new blocks, that's certainly true but for sending historical blocks and seding transactions I don't think so. This PR is really designed to save bandwidth and not intended to be a huge performance improvement in terms of time spent sending.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Johnathan Corgan via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:58 PM, gladoscc via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
I think 25% bandwidth savings is certainly considerable, especially for people running full nodes in countries like Australia where internet bandwidth is lower and there are data caps.
This reinforces the idea that such trade-off decisions should be be local and negotiated between peers, not a required feature of the network P2P.--
Johnathan Corgan
Corgan Labs - SDR Training and Development Services
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev