From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YzC8P-0005ix-EB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:55:13 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.172; envelope-from=alex.mizrahi@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f172.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YzC8O-0000cu-OU for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:55:13 +0000 Received: by wibut5 with SMTP id ut5so23691695wib.1 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 15:55:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.231.4 with SMTP id tc4mr15455812wic.27.1433112906786; Sun, 31 May 2015 15:55:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.102.73 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 15:55:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <554BE0E1.5030001@bluematt.me> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 01:55:06 +0300 Message-ID: From: Alex Mizrahi To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134cc28bb6c1f0517689918 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (alex.mizrahi[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YzC8O-0000cu-OU Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 22:55:13 -0000 --001a1134cc28bb6c1f0517689918 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Yes, if you are on a slow network then you are at a (slight) disadvantage. > So? > Chun mentioned that his pool is on a slow network, and thus bigger blocks give it an disadvantage. (Orphan rate is proportional to block size.) You said that no, on contrary those who make big blocks have a disadvantage. And now you say that yes, this disadvantage exist. Did you just lie to Chun? --001a1134cc28bb6c1f0517689918 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, if you are on a slow network then you are at a (slight) di= sadvantage. So?

Chun mentioned that his pool is on a slow network, and thus= bigger blocks give it an disadvantage. (Orphan rate is proportional to blo= ck size.)
You said that no, on contrary those who make big blocks= have a disadvantage.
And now you say that yes, this disadvantage= exist.

Did you just lie to Chun?

--001a1134cc28bb6c1f0517689918--