From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B18AAB2E for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 12:15:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com (mail-qk0-f176.google.com [209.85.220.176]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 414CA175 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 12:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id u75so126145396qka.3 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 05:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eT2rM98hzCi6kcngQQHO1mIDgRpeV8/bnCHQt3jus48=; b=QtMFqBtLCe7bk9OPgzrP9P17tpt5+8K0AYraU/NVo+ESH/vBgSy2DiW6oRAuLSj6os 0y8vGASAO0s1dx0q1YfofwnavKMjxV+pcOWdxluZ7kO024goCsmWjiRAOWmDdXnQKwju 4mJYxkrO53sgumguSEge+JhlH6PSijWZ0nyLsGR4xQ6/YmbA8sS9eozzUUbl4igY7IQ1 x7gefqhVA50Mx0vfEJXUgnkhN+JdNGrQFM842pZhl9J4YHw3SSWR2sEOs9GRAgLw4QGh +ImeeMKWocE32N4dqJaPMQKZKoGqNFgcVPKzdZIZeunqay4k+lmbfzXKBF7dmsBRVfFh HQRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=eT2rM98hzCi6kcngQQHO1mIDgRpeV8/bnCHQt3jus48=; b=pYciTaP2H0r3WL+w/2NUoZ3LjeJiwNMJrfsYHyCTO194+eYwvcqzJs/mKGah1cdpeG ljmrpzrr1wjkjODxQCwUuCntIN6hdImOtd5KCFbnxmD4tEgHItHizEj6qPEvkIFerrJn KejBUgNo1NQbuoRUqJWUI6smagHBx0yF2vcY9LVfvFMuG5gQOM7YivuJjF+w3Xb7pAvk dnSM7TcdLb+Dznm/SSfO+KfAuGOi7MbHSJdkQ973ToGwern4y1I+PRQqtdYcQ3Pxla0e 1nmMB7AZ1Bl95PpcbrMXc5BoGf2W35hZ+C8PcwXnhecW40Ef1ggkdwGpkX4RWvj/NW1O dBSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDIktqnzgD2ZZBRuAIlhwYZhWt9Ev8rXmxiBHzymcO/qmPNZkaZ oqD7Kf4Az09U/agy0YNROwB+MeZnHrvMBhI= X-Received: by 10.55.110.132 with SMTP id j126mr10878178qkc.227.1494936918320; Tue, 16 May 2017 05:15:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.160.143 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2017 05:15:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170223011147.GB905@savin.petertodd.org> References: <20170223011147.GB905@savin.petertodd.org> From: Alex Mizrahi Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 15:15:17 +0300 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05c09cfa6b60054fa31fe9" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] TXO commitments do not need a soft-fork to be useful X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 12:15:19 -0000 --94eb2c05c09cfa6b60054fa31fe9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Something I've recently realised is that TXO commitments do not need to be > implemented as a consensus protocol change to be useful. You're slow, Peter. I figured this out back in 2013: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=153662.10 --94eb2c05c09cfa6b60054fa31fe9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=
Something I've recent= ly realised is that TXO commitments do not need to be
implemented as a consensus protocol change to be useful.=C2=A0
=

You're slow, Peter. I figured this out back in 2013= :

--94eb2c05c09cfa6b60054fa31fe9--