From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94011C53 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:58:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52F7E148 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l68so31178692wml.0 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:58:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=9jQLN9jB/95JrbffQehqMjQSLfJ2U5bUfmAyl219oJ4=; b=vdpQB+reHxGdDbXtHqe40mYFyQuQatSCKMY7TdBZdjnj5HXAUpR7pUsXEUfagI6RMl 04c3DugDrBD7ILXbx3cm/3ebyi6l/69S+6MOkTTu5m4YPOgIrT9x9Jb4nWXnXQLTkXC2 op7LoVOwVNu0WGRfL+w/YWDs9sFpfcJix3Jr8K9kK0lVg4pzh5LFTeh00xuGNF4asd0v 5IGDCDhedL+0prtANlNJegKhPmWdb6xWj+gttxayLs4jIObflG00UOnRp6jJLMpTGihu diqjEWgy/s0qkoHVbBnrJUHgCoPJ/NglOZTpjsH/n/U9PwenDsVnFHJskVyeqZkyzsOI 5vDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=9jQLN9jB/95JrbffQehqMjQSLfJ2U5bUfmAyl219oJ4=; b=WdHBUzMqSHAOVhxk0FZkkWu+Hfo68HzRFE+oW00KmS2/Bt7kGzKQWBL/5kip5VATq3 zKHrpNoh3x1ne9HydBI0pxUFEXAuPL1+MGR9wytOpXWZ6fpQ3upzR7fj2qQdEhm21JzQ kbpgrmnLteKaCMEes3DgQ+PiRzwgl1VUI6Ctnc3V42NWQAvX39kMp7BuGHauUhJjEchd kF7wRBdgU0slTFg1ExquH2rmFpZdDH2PiMFgdT8fu3fnmp+Y0ye1y2ilg4ZgLEiNhsTU 6pSNgGAB4B3CBmSw0lc1RaZfvh9w3YZSUNuUKNix3xuRObuOPtz7wKXSLxZ04+726STo Dj5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJInkojkvJrl4Z/w+BBG/G5KyRn4lTNPBkWLllpPcGGIBBGnRpzfw3oeIYMLSDIYsx6DRNLNhFMo7yzWqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.137.139 with SMTP id l133mr11857343wmd.1.1456743487052; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:58:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.88.20 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:58:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <23e401d16552$996546d0$cc2fd470$@xbt.hk> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:58:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: Mats Jerratsch To: Tier Nolan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:58:09 -0000 This is actually very useful for LN too, see relevant discussion here http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011827.html 2016-02-12 11:05 GMT+01:00 Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev : > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:02 AM, wrote: >> >> Seems it could be done without any new opcode: > > > The assumption was that the altcoin would only accept standard output > scripts. Alice's payment in step 2 pays to a non-standard script. > > This is an improvement over the cut and choose, but it will only work for > coins which allow non-standard scripts (type 2 in the BIP). > > I guess I was to focused on maintaining standard scripts on the altcoin. > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >