Can we please keep this mail chain discussion specific to the proposed draft - https://github.com/UpalChakraborty/bips/blob/master/BIP-DynamicMaxBlockSize.mediawiki ?

I understand, voting process is an important subject of discussion. But, that may be discussed in a separate mail chain.

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Hector Chu via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On 26 August 2015 at 01:29, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> For instance, a very simple toy example that would work is just XORing your vote with SHA256(the entire blockchain)

Uh, that would totally not work.

I think my proposal of using CLTV to lock coins (votes) is better.
Failing a soft-fork to implement that in time, counting votes from the
UTXO set is also ok - the difference between that and CLTV is that it
is not as strong an evidence of commitment.
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev