From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Yzcwr-0005se-AQ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:33:05 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.174; envelope-from=eth3rs@gmail.com; helo=mail-qc0-f174.google.com; Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Yzcwq-0007qu-AC for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:33:05 +0000 Received: by qcxw10 with SMTP id w10so55363438qcx.3 for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:32:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.58.73 with SMTP id f9mr5298531qch.30.1433215978900; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 20:32:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.18.240 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:32:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <556CDB09.8050906@henricson.se> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:32:58 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ethan Heilman To: gabe appleton Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133196c4f13e70517809968 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (eth3rs[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Yzcwq-0007qu-AC Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:33:05 -0000 --001a1133196c4f13e70517809968 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various positions and arguments would be extremely helpful. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton wrote: > Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could > condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if > the page gets approval. > On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate >> drives me nuts. >> >> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles: >> >> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will >> take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other >> smarter people have said over and over before, you're >> wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't. >> >> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is >> just destructive. If you want no change, then say so. >> >> Mats >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > --001a1133196c4f13e70517809968 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I second this, I don't have time to read the large num= ber of emails generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of = the various positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.=C2=A0
=

On Mon, Jun 1, 20= 15 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com> wrot= e:

Also, can we try to get= a wiki page for the debate? That way we could condense the information as = much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if the page gets approval. =

On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson&quo= t; <mats@henricso= n.se> wrote:
= Hi!

My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
drives me nuts.

I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:

1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
=C2=A0 =C2=A0take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
=C2=A0 =C2=A0smarter people have said over and over before, you're
=C2=A0 =C2=A0wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.

2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
=C2=A0 =C2=A0just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.

Mats

---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment

-----------------------------------------------------------= -------------------

_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment


--001a1133196c4f13e70517809968--