public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke Durback <luke.durback@gmail.com>
To: "Jorge Timón" <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Standard BIP Draft: Turing Pseudo-Completeness
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 01:36:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEj3M+ze9HU1KWoWT2nugw9hYY97jk_xsL8WUWqThq_wrXSAVg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDq3K2uUWx_itZQJH53EFOJKAWOLiy3NdHWGPvUOCm33wA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 979 bytes --]

Tomorrow, I'll work on writing a way to do voting on proposals with BTC
used as voting shares (This will be difficult as I do not know FORTH).
That seems like a fairly simple, useful example that will require loops and
reused functions.  I'll add a fee that goes to the creator.

IMO, if you write a complicated system of scripts that's used frequently,
it makes sense to charge a fee for its usage.  A decentralized exchange
between colored coins, for instance might take a small fee on each trade.


On Dec 10, 2015 10:10 AM, "Luke Durback via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This, combined with the ability to make new transactions arbitrarily
would allow a function to pay its creator.

I don't understand what you mean by "a function" in this context, I assume
you mean a scriptSig, but then "paying its creator" doesn't make much sense
to me .

Could you provide some high level examples of the use cases you would like
to support with this?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1367 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-10  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-10  1:35 [bitcoin-dev] Standard BIP Draft: Turing Pseudo-Completeness Luke Durback
2015-12-10  4:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2015-12-10  4:23   ` Luke Durback
2015-12-10  5:38 ` Jorge Timón
2015-12-10  6:36   ` Luke Durback [this message]
2015-12-11 15:36     ` Jorge Timón
2015-12-11 15:38       ` Jorge Timón
2015-12-11 21:45       ` Luke Durback
2015-12-12 20:00         ` Jorge Timón
2015-12-12 21:01           ` Emin Gün Sirer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAEj3M+ze9HU1KWoWT2nugw9hYY97jk_xsL8WUWqThq_wrXSAVg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luke.durback@gmail.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jtimon@jtimon.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox