From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8552405 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:37:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2A9A8 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oixx65 with SMTP id x65so31828899oix.0 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:37:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yZd+bza8Kp116Z+TNL4tk8O6kucXAWUdsBQ5wVF1uUw=; b=hT/tdkGOXd8tZYv0gffqatuu+b3QIbYmeioSbDS+ouHvDpnZDgYNeLnv82CW1KIUtD w47gMeA8wnT4QnTTavzrfZZEeXZs1U+ZxeN7Do1e1G+jp4kfV7s7WZ4wSfJ9sEVkzfkB A8rcwzxOwbUZn6I5UyVMleg3VBdOQLAqVBRVIC405uVw0zOHBJ9rcablZqWQ+5I99Kk+ gr4o7ja2r77RLagJpm2Zu3fTAHR/LmnwimseI5kJLPdxlE2yNuB6Xan8P8dTySevDvGb 2XuoEXCB55s2pMtj0DY44EtDqkwbKacGKYH5wLuAw2C1DtlyyRRNFjGzJiKCh3xXK7zw KYHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.44.207 with SMTP id s198mr6289701ois.18.1447385854296; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.48.20 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:37:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:37:34 -0500 Message-ID: From: John Sacco To: Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11379e1ab2c88b052463c786 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:56:17 +0000 Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Block size doubles at each reward halving with max block size of 32M X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:37:35 -0000 --001a11379e1ab2c88b052463c786 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I like your suggestion for the continuity and it gets us up to 2 MB in the shorter term. Also I just noticed the math error. Here is a revised spec (incorporating suggestions from Chun Wang): Specification * 1 MB, height < 210,000; * 2 MB, height 210,000 < 420,000; (when 75% of last 1,000 blocks signal support) * 4 MB, height 420,000 < 630,000; (year 2016) * 8 MB, height 630,000 < 840,000; (year ~2020) * 16 MB, height 840,000 < 1,050,000; (year ~2024) * 32 MB, height >= 1,050,000. (year ~2028) On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com> wrote: > How about these specs: > * 1 MB, height < 210000; > * 2 MB, 210000 <= height < 420000; > * 4 MB, 420000 <= height < 630000; > * 8 MB, 630000 <= height < 840000; > * 16 MB, 840000 <= height < 1050000; > * 32 MB, height >= 1050000. > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:47 AM, John Sacco via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > Hi Devs, > > > > > > Please consider the draft proposal below for peer review. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > John > > > > > > BIP > > > > BIP: ? > > > > Title: Block size doubles at each reward halving with max block size of > > 32M > > > > Author: John Sacco > > > > Status: Draft > > > > Type: Standards Track > > > > Created: 2015-11-11 > > > > Abstract > > > > Change max block size to 2MB at next block subsidy halving, and double > the > > block size at each subsidy halving until reaching 32MB. > > > > Copyright > > > > This proposal belongs in the public domain. Anyone can use this text for > any > > purpose with proper attribution to the author. > > > > Motivation > > > > 1. Gradually restores block size to the default 32 MB setting > originally > > implemented by Satoshi. > > > > 2. Initial increase to 2MB at block halving in July 2016 would have > > minimal impact to existing nodes running on most hardware and networks. > > > > 3. Long term solution that does not make enthusiastic assumptions > > regarding future bandwidth and storage availability estimates. > > > > 4. Maximum block size of 32MB allows peak usage of ~100 tx/sec by year > > 2031. > > > > 5. Exercise network upgrade procedure during subsidy reward halving, a > > milestone event with the goal of increasing awareness among miners and > node > > operators. > > > > Specification > > > > 1. Increase the maximum block size to 2MB when block 630,000 is > reached > > and 75% of the last 1,000 blocks have signaled support. > > > > 2. Increase maximum block size to 4MB at block 840,000. > > > > 3. Increase maximum block size to 8MB at block 1,050,000. > > > > 4. Increase maximum block size to 16MB at block 1,260,000. > > > > 5. Increase maximum block size to 32MB at block 1,470,000. > > > > Backward compatibility > > > > All older clients are not compatible with this change. The first block > > larger than 1M will create a network partition excluding not-upgraded > > network nodes and miners. > > > > Rationale > > > > While more comprehensive solutions are developed, an increase to the > block > > size is needed to continue network growth. A longer term solution is > needed > > to prevent complications associated with additional hard forks. It should > > also increase at a gradual rate that retains and allows a large > distribution > > of full nodes. Scheduling this hard fork to occur no earlier than the > > subsidy halving in 2016 has the goal of simplifying the communication > > outreach needed to achieve consensus, while also providing a buffer of > time > > to make necessary preparations. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > bitcoin-dev mailing list > > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > > --001a11379e1ab2c88b052463c786 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I like your suggestion for the continuity and it gets us u= p to 2 MB in the shorter term. Also I just noticed the math error.=C2=A0
Here is a revised spec (incorporating suggestions from Chu= n Wang):

Specification

* 1 MB, height < 210,000;
* 2 = MB, height 210,000 < 420,000; (when 75% of last 1,000 blocks signal supp= ort)
* 4 MB, height 420,000 < 630,000; = (year 2016)
* 8 MB, height 630,000 < 84= 0,000; (year ~2020)
* 16 MB, height 840,00= 0 < 1,050,000; (year ~2024)
* 32 MB, he= ight >=3D 1,050,000. (year ~2028)



On Thu, Nov 12= , 2015 at 9:56 PM, Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">How about these specs:
* 1 MB, height < 210000;
* 2 MB, 210000 <=3D height < 420000;
* 4 MB, 420000 <=3D height < 630000;
* 8 MB, 630000 <=3D height < 840000;
* 16 MB, 840000 <=3D height < 1050000;
* 32 MB, height >=3D 1050000.


On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:47 AM, John Sacco via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@li= sts.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
>
> Please consider the draft proposal below for peer review.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> John
>
>
> BIP
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0BIP: ?
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Title: Block size doubles at each reward halving with max = block size of
> 32M
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Author: John Sacco <johnsock@gmail.com>
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Status: Draft
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Type: Standards Track
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Created: 2015-11-11
>
> Abstract
>
> Change max block size to 2MB at next block subsidy halving, and double= the
> block size at each subsidy halving until reaching 32MB.
>
> Copyright
>
> This proposal belongs in the public domain. Anyone can use this text f= or any
> purpose with proper attribution to the author.
>
> Motivation
>
> 1.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Gradually restores block size to the default 32 MB set= ting originally
> implemented by Satoshi.
>
> 2.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Initial increase to 2MB at block halving in July 2016 = would have
> minimal impact to existing nodes running on most hardware and networks= .
>
> 3.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Long term solution that does not make enthusiastic ass= umptions
> regarding future bandwidth and storage availability estimates.
>
> 4.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Maximum block size of 32MB allows peak usage of ~100 t= x/sec by year
> 2031.
>
> 5.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Exercise network upgrade procedure during subsidy rewa= rd halving, a
> milestone event with the goal of increasing awareness among miners and= node
> operators.
>
> Specification
>
> 1.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Increase the maximum block size to 2MB when block 630,= 000 is reached
> and 75% of the last 1,000 blocks have signaled support.
>
> 2.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Increase maximum block size to 4MB at block 840,000. >
> 3.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Increase maximum block size to 8MB at block 1,050,000.=
>
> 4.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Increase maximum block size to 16MB at block 1,260,000= .
>
> 5.=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Increase maximum block size to 32MB at block 1,470,000= .
>
> Backward compatibility
>
> All older clients are not compatible with this change. The first block=
> larger than 1M will create a network partition excluding not-upgraded<= br> > network nodes and miners.
>
> Rationale
>
> While more comprehensive solutions are developed, an increase to the b= lock
> size is needed to continue network growth. A longer term solution is n= eeded
> to prevent complications associated with additional hard forks. It sho= uld
> also increase at a gradual rate that retains and allows a large distri= bution
> of full nodes.=C2=A0 Scheduling this hard fork to occur no earlier tha= n the
> subsidy halving in 2016 has the goal of simplifying the communication<= br> > outreach needed to achieve consensus, while also providing a buffer of= time
> to make necessary preparations.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@l= ists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org= /mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

--001a11379e1ab2c88b052463c786--