you mixed up BitMail with BitMessage, this is different: http://bitmail.sf.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Not lately. It's pretty CPU and network intensive, which may or may
On 08/09/2013 03:01 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
> anyone tested the secure encrypted p2p email:
> http://bitmail.sf.net
not be detrimental to your use case.
I keep meaning to read through these security analyses of Bitmessage
but I'm a little short on compute cycles at the moment:
https://bitmessage.org/forum/index.php?topic=1666.0
http://www.reddit.com/r/bitmessage/comments/1fwyx7/a_security_analysis_of_bitmessage/
- --
The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS]
Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/
PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/
If at first you don't succeed, call for an airstrike.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlIKk94ACgkQO9j/K4B7F8FMsgCgkuM56fI4hVT9H1ueZSFwl9Kk
qRoAoJkKZf4afKgVQKtDO6zRd/Auc/RV
=zwmX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development