From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VjxxJ-0001TL-E1 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:08:01 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.160.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.52; envelope-from=wtogami@gmail.com; helo=mail-pb0-f52.google.com; Received: from mail-pb0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1VjxxH-0006Bl-F2 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:08:01 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id uo5so1837337pbc.11 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:07:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.136.101 with SMTP id pz5mr3175585pbb.186.1385154473586; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:07:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.158.129 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:07:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:07:53 -1000 Message-ID: From: "Warren Togami Jr." To: Jeff Garzik Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15a8835b807b04ebca688f X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: doubleclick.net] -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (wtogami[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1VjxxH-0006Bl-F2 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [PATCH, try2] bitcoind: whitelist nodes against banning X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:08:01 -0000 --047d7b15a8835b807b04ebca688f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2906 There is already a bannode RPC PR. Last I tried it didn't work though. On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell > wrote: > > Is there a reason not to have a parallel get rpc to get the current list? > > Easy enough to add. There had also been requests for an IP blacklist, > which would need associated RPC/config gadgetry. > > -- > Jeff Garzik > Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist > BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription > Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. > Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing > conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up > now. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > --047d7b15a8835b807b04ebca688f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
h= ttps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2906
There is already a = bannode RPC PR. =C2=A0Last I tried it didn't work though.


On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jeff G= arzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a reason not to have a parallel get rpc to get the current li= st?

Easy enough to add. =C2=A0There had also been requests for an IP blac= klist,
which would need associated RPC/config gadgetry.

--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0https://bitpay.com/

-----------------------------= -------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now= .
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam= pad/clk?id=3D63431311&iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment

--047d7b15a8835b807b04ebca688f--