From: Chris Stewart <chris@suredbits.com>
To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
"dlc-dev@mailmanlists.org" <dlc-dev@mailmanlists.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Recurring bitcoin/LN payments using DLCs
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 08:45:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFQwNuxaphkKbVwFdmRRJ7DX2tqMpvfk=8syuBXTTqJ2qBW9rg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MhqXmoLUj9JwcnZOETQr9lMMsbR_o75DrOG-v1Fz6FN571n31EgGAJUaSGOvMCSmDBSaI4hjAqtl5mLAWTnOjbWHAaJPzrpl06vhmt5xXSI=@protonmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 974 bytes --]
Hey ZmnSCPxj,
I thought about this for a few days and I think you are right. In the case
of recurring payments this is identical to nLocktime. When doing recurring
payments with this scheme, you probably want to rate limit subsequent UTXOs
_with_ nlocktimes to make sure a malicious Netflix can't withdraw 12 month
so of subscriptions by attesting with their oracle 12 times.
I think this proposal describes arbitrary lines of pre-approved credit from
a bitcoin wallet. The line can be drawn down with oracle attestations. You
can mix in locktimes on these pre-approved lines of credit if you would
like to rate limit, or ignore rate limiting and allow the full utxo to be
spent by the borrower. It really is contextual to the use case IMO.
-Chris
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 2:22 AM ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
> Good morning Chris,
>
> Quick question.
>
> How does this improve over just handing over `nLockTime`d transactions?
>
>
> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1386 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-05 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 12:58 [bitcoin-dev] Recurring bitcoin/LN payments using DLCs Chris Stewart
2022-03-04 8:22 ` ZmnSCPxj
2022-03-05 14:45 ` Chris Stewart [this message]
2022-03-05 22:57 ` ZmnSCPxj
2022-03-06 0:14 ` Jeremy Rubin
2022-03-06 14:05 ` Chris Stewart
2022-03-06 20:11 ` ZmnSCPxj
2022-03-06 20:53 ` Chris Stewart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFQwNuxaphkKbVwFdmRRJ7DX2tqMpvfk=8syuBXTTqJ2qBW9rg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=chris@suredbits.com \
--cc=ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dlc-dev@mailmanlists.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox