public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Wilcox <nathan@leastauthority.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:30:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFdHNGg-gJ99L4oartyMMX3PhykhekNbuLrs7Z8JN0zTpwgaZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150610200323.GA13724@savin.petertodd.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1859 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:00:27PM -0600, Nathan Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > It could be done by agreeing on a data format and encoding it in an
> > > op_return output in the coinbase transaction. If it catches on it could
> > > later be enforced with a soft fork.
> > >
> > >
> > Sounds plausible, except SPV protocols would need to include this
> coinbase
> > txn if it's going to help SPV clients. (Until a softfork is activated,
> SPV
> > clients should not rely on this encoding, since until that time the
> results
> > can be fabricated by individual miners.)
>
> Fee stats can always be fabricated by individual miners because fees can
> be paid out-of-band.
>
>
This is a point I hadn't considered carefully before. I don't understand
the marketplace here or why miners would want to move fees outside of
explicit inband fees. Implicit in this proposal is that the statistics only
cover in-band data, because that's the scope of consensus rules, and thus
the proposal is only as useful as the information of in-band fees is useful.

I've also noticed a detracting technical argument given a particular
tradeoff:

A Header-PoW-verifying client could still be given all transactions in a
recent block, from which it can see the in-band fees directly.  The
trade-off is the size of those transactions versus the need to alter any
consensus rules or do soft forks.

Notice how this trade-off's costs change with maximum block size.




> --
> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 00000000000000001245bd2f5c99379ee76836227ded9c08324894faabc0d27f
>



-- 
Nathan Wilcox
Least Authoritarian

email: nathan@leastauthority.com
twitter: @least_nathan
PGP: 11169993 / AAAC 5675 E3F7 514C 67ED  E9C9 3BFE 5263 1116 9993

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2839 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-11 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-10 17:37 [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Nathan Wilcox
2015-06-10 19:19 ` Aaron Voisine
2015-06-10 20:00   ` Nathan Wilcox
2015-06-10 20:03     ` Peter Todd
2015-06-11 18:30       ` Nathan Wilcox [this message]
2015-06-11 18:55         ` Aaron Voisine
2015-06-13 15:38           ` Nathan Wilcox
2015-06-10 21:18     ` Aaron Voisine
2015-06-10 20:26 ` Mike Hearn
2015-06-10 21:18   ` Aaron Voisine
2015-06-11 10:19     ` Mike Hearn
2015-06-11 13:10     ` Peter Todd
2015-06-11 14:11       ` Martin Lie
2015-06-11 17:10       ` Tom Harding
2015-06-11 17:52         ` Mike Hearn
2015-06-12  6:44           ` Aaron Voisine
2015-06-11 18:18       ` Nathan Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFdHNGg-gJ99L4oartyMMX3PhykhekNbuLrs7Z8JN0zTpwgaZw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nathan@leastauthority.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pete@petertodd.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox