From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A5C5722 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:30:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com (mail-pa0-f41.google.com [209.85.220.41]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16589202 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pabkd10 with SMTP id kd10so8920707pab.2 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:30:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cTJ3Ubo83BXoxXoqnTYheyJNbqtX47r0qlX3JodnvMg=; b=EpupABEwXSjV1l2zKe9akhwn9rxNfbNReYPYzAKIBW+KWSMz5M38ZXta2mHaxL/y91 5RFDlPaN3Ej4mK9StTWC7JBbXIQOkeLSWreTX7338kwvSAFr+7m/1p09E86Fkpii4vg/ kX2Ip2GaDZ9QnZHzENJjjBxiUDwmxwElsRKNQ9Zz/x8VFL4pnVOI74B/Bzf+RZsI1J0x kCSJpMyTIVzGdNrFqmoYRGFGzwJsCPMv+oMpH8MUP5D0sLyPO5mS+6pwa6UbhFJd4riu 8DLpPii3mRPthxIpxitMFHH2jO6Y8yFIVzzjStQOh3Z9MpCN2p8vOIJg15AriPzKblYo mUGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.65.205 with SMTP id z13mr95903002pas.65.1438191008788; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.83.7 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:30:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1B7F00D3-41AE-44BF-818D-EC4EF279DC11@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:00:08 +0530 Message-ID: From: Sriram Karra To: Gregory Maxwell Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11362f3a32bb89051c06f0c1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:30:09 -0000 --001a11362f3a32bb89051c06f0c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev > > > > Miners who don't validate have a habit of bleeding money: that's the > > system working as designed. > > The information I have currently is that the parties engaging in that > activity found it to be tremendously profitable, even including losses > from issues. Is there any shred of evidence either of you can share to support your claims on this pivotal point of interest to everyone here? --001a11362f3a32bb89051c06f0c1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev


> Miners who don't validate have a habit of bleeding money:=C2=A0 = =C2=A0that's the
> system working as designed.

The information I have currently is that the parties engaging in tha= t
activity found it to be tremendously profitable, even including losses
from issues.

Is there any shred of evidence= either of you can share to support your claims on this pivotal point of in= terest to everyone here?=C2=A0
--001a11362f3a32bb89051c06f0c1--