From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F72C000B for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4733484369 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=johnnewbery-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j_g4GIGcvukh for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27D4684333 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u25so16449077ljg.7 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:49:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=johnnewbery-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CIT9T41GvQKJl1VhYmSIR+u9WvZZxexEvRsw5fg2dUg=; b=Mrs8v4NExJfDeawfZIc6Of79/LcOPI1SHmHgZBtriFNyUL1cQNgfQr7ak+q+AbZ7TG XMtj+Qblei56oVuvXLT+XV5ScV3tLG64AuPYaoGQVdn4Qi61/8UCX915PRy2Ar0Y40b8 qpm8lbSCLKhvM+HTeMxgGCI9yyUswEX5s3VtXzHq++YwyN972AQjPhcFjxjL9S/mVyN8 8ypHKLWR+kF9NXacAmZJwWuuEJY+vj6r2hPU3XsyJ2A2+S7HtHFNZh1Gq8QTAehmhQkb FRw6qNe/tU1ilQFWfOs983CSNwWhchjpFBFkbftXvgpHmZEFFzuybD0z/ICwqC+X5f0x H6bQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=CIT9T41GvQKJl1VhYmSIR+u9WvZZxexEvRsw5fg2dUg=; b=I3UwAnnubYsHkXdAAkstXLr4NRiKH+z8Rlszd5LpBpAcL7aDx9AtLBuXkpiXI2zT09 NGEhNE/h3MBb/7ukLMCWjxC8H4SM4zCcqYvAFjDQKenYokpa5/t4ybWAJz6EeZzpjI6b cFenicx1ch+66NW3+mJXH3x2VejTHBtOn50AzTrTKWV2SRQMS1+SIpTEsvBeeR0Uj8Of aWGoFQv++xKL3MwbbpghNkHCgNAwGFHMdDEcz5JJNcgLaJujAbeye3rAuQ4By1DoHxZJ d0CJcLADaemFmUYdn4t96eahPB7u3UYrTPVQ3kLL+JRj6+u3Ph0pVD0Nk5AFkX+u4kpF +HtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+e5bDJT67nW0dJiiqeSaUPgNCpaN0VUcqFAnJu3i9rCoe7x1n aaElqWBaUFqep1QIEKO9Rcvw3qUMPTPb4BKH X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFwF2RLnBMxf0CRJY1P6pRAnl9XU+KyUZqieac3S7gVo+AsxZz1z/wPhL8+gzpFf/rQM5nSw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:bc0c:: with SMTP id b12mr1902512ljf.502.1619164191108; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com (mail-lf1-f50.google.com. [209.85.167.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p18sm473554lfu.52.2021.04.23.00.49.50 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:49:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id x19so45768985lfa.2 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:49:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3ed:: with SMTP id n13mr1801384lfq.439.1619164190457; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:49:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202104230209.05373.luke@dashjr.org> In-Reply-To: From: John Newbery Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:49:39 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000067c55105c09f0ad7" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:43:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:55 -0000 --00000000000067c55105c09f0ad7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" ACK adding Kalle. On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:36 AM Jeremy via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > ACK adding Kalle. > > Kalle is a qualified reviewer / editor and well suited for this role. > -- > @JeremyRubin > > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 7:09 PM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to >> assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo. >> >> Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should >> be >> fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression: >> >> > A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves >> > rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have >> > rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development >> > mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any >> > unaddressed substantiated objections to it. >> >> A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is >> unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we >> can go >> that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing new >> BIP >> editors, so I think this should be fine. >> >> Please speak up soon if you disagree. >> >> Luke >> _______________________________________________ >> bitcoin-dev mailing list >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --00000000000067c55105c09f0ad7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
ACK adding Kalle.

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:36 AM J= eremy via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
ACK adding Kalle.

Kalle is a qualified r= eviewer / editor and well suited for this role.


On Thu, Apr 22, 20= 21 at 7:09 PM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfounda= tion.org> wrote:
Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP edi= tor to
assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo.

Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should be =
fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression:

> A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves<= br> > rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have > rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development > mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any
> unaddressed substantiated objections to it.

A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is
unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we can = go
that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing new BIP=
editors, so I think this should be fine.

Please speak up soon if you disagree.

Luke
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--00000000000067c55105c09f0ad7--