From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB44F904 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:17:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qk0-f171.google.com (mail-qk0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F1BD0 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id x190so106006131qkb.0 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:17:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s3LQWY7GOqcgQ8RHc7IiT4/tYNJYp4RWxMV4wi+a/Wg=; b=b4+SvOiDZsx/LuPFR93KaX602WJenRmx2/llufsSkBaW4LFyys9880tJiDufU7RGEw FOP7LWjPQn1iN+GF4hbx1sNB+ESBG/zPzgb6j2Xrw8RTJh49GjTzrVyk6txKWAULMnom RY0DWoFAlBxe6F9BJTvW5p+TPD/kVlWK+a6h9YJN4qp9w+jx/ubNbw3BfXKXgzRvM8iX WGL3gcvvN/OWeZls+UCKAzeCYq+Bk0Uq/GTFahvpwbU8EVaYZQoYRV6tIkOx5PVPK9Xi WJdKssckb4SHdCzNwTbrQa83gXe4I9xU1VacUhY6cO/QjUwClIkMHYaurvplauvA0AqK EeWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s3LQWY7GOqcgQ8RHc7IiT4/tYNJYp4RWxMV4wi+a/Wg=; b=L8GwfCMbeYAUGU5DE3MCt5eDQ8eAvEATW7QssagzkhwJWcob5mmg3rGdd8AvPXgnc3 zlLFsoQ52Ljr/BmdJmsvujKssxgu79EdwhJ7zFwPA1/5y15ANZWcnOdIb7cKlYvQdtKA nHEn3pNgTA4+rUgfF7HC5Lw2BRGMjASHLJkCRW2lfmLuYZrqlczvDXkd4XBF+ITZChhg Z87vn8kQt6Qyal0FntW1ulCls2kfZm3SqAdt1ZzlhiUazJaxbm9ncr+bhk6UfoFzHEWy qYohkpv1R8GpxQ+8x/uxTCVw5ZOQSSZoc6M2j9T5fQWgqhVqlfXaRsWtt+k5LBrJ0K7H v4jw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvel675XJmWt2fy2CswGJtQcVCojb7CtTAyIOvfCxf0re9UOdae9fZk0Td0QivauhA8ISSku3ib8UjTYqQ== X-Received: by 10.55.5.134 with SMTP id 128mr19665383qkf.261.1479147446004; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:17:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.88.133 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:17:25 -0800 (PST) From: Suhas Daftuar Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:17:25 -0500 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114c819e16f260054146da99 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] Buried Deployments X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:17:27 -0000 --001a114c819e16f260054146da99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Recently Bitcoin Core merged a simplification to the consensus rules surrounding deployment of BIPs 34, 66, and 65 ( https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8391), and though the change is a minor one, I thought it was worth documenting the rationale in a BIP for posterity. Here's the abstract: Prior soft forks (BIP 34, BIP 65, and BIP 66) were activated via miner signaling in block version numbers. Now that the chain has long since passed the blocks at which those consensus rules have triggered, we can (as a simplification and optimization) replace the trigger mechanism by caching the block heights at which those consensus rules became enforced. The full draft can be found here: https://github.com/sdaftuar/bips/blob/buried-deployments/bip-buried-deployments.mediawiki --001a114c819e16f260054146da99 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

Recently Bitcoin Core merged a simp= lification to the consensus rules surrounding deployment of BIPs 34, 66, an= d 65 (https://gith= ub.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8391), and though the change is a minor one= , I thought it was worth documenting the rationale in a BIP for posterity.<= /div>

Here's the abstract:

= Prior soft forks (BIP 34, BIP 65, and BIP 66) were activated via miner sign= aling in block version numbers. Now that the chain has long since passed th= e blocks at which those consensus rules have triggered, we can (as a simpli= fication and optimization) replace the trigger mechanism by caching the blo= ck heights at which those consensus rules became enforced.
=
The full draft can be found here:=C2=A0

--001a114c819e16f260054146da99--