From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC2F305 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:41:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com (mail-la0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103737D for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lalv9 with SMTP id v9so66591977lal.0 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:41:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=7fpLPPrrE7dvt8B7Xe1tOcdifCI2XPZ3dKRzbAeaBgY=; b=QPYRA3erKsFumDXHtXN0dcNTOo0zNPNQ5ARj5ZiX2kALHn+IIuD62OWqUsJ/igrSBu 4BzI0tUUbo2SyVKXqfIqpgz3LPo1wZT7GONWbSjSDW5bhyxRmO2gM5FargCloLP0J+p1 Xoc1g1T0Oh8fxjZbFUDnP+VjZr/gDt8wyrGHe7IMmGyKMnNKFckHMpO5b9O8z/wG8P89 R1x0lSWo6Jh31GeX4MRRmaEgUPIJrvITjS7v4G429Jj4FCqmB5l0nnfh7vTjWcTIrVNR khsF+XAdSLUc5RnUkC4bbZSMASJ1kqTjBtTx5U5waPdMBGSBCfJ5+iGzUgmvyXNQWhak /U2w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzRb7qfqVTcBu97CI6aO42TayFUVoCu2tV1iBkOyW3P74w+bZLejMvLG09tejnigo/NRXX X-Received: by 10.112.42.172 with SMTP id p12mr51902449lbl.52.1439743276362; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:41:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Levin Keller Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:41:05 +0000 Message-ID: To: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134d44e8e43ff051d705a23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum Block Size X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:41:18 -0000 --001a1134d44e8e43ff051d705a23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hey everyone, as with the current "max block size" debate I was wondering: Is anyone here in favor of a minimum block size (say 2 MB or so)? If so I would be interested in an exchange (maybe off-list) of ideas. I am in favor of a lower limit and am giving it quite a bit of thought at the moment. Cheers Levin --001a1134d44e8e43ff051d705a23 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey everyone,

as with the current "= ;max block size" debate I was wondering: Is anyone here in favor of a = minimum block size (say 2 MB or so)? If so I would be interested in an exch= ange (maybe off-list) of ideas. I am in favor of a lower limit and am givin= g it quite a bit of thought at the moment.

Cheers<= /div>

Levin
--001a1134d44e8e43ff051d705a23--