From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <harald.schilly@gmail.com>) id 1UMl7P-0001fC-SC
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 01 Apr 2013 20:14:15 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.223.170 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.223.170; envelope-from=harald.schilly@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ie0-f170.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com ([209.85.223.170])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1UMl7M-0004Pw-66
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 01 Apr 2013 20:14:15 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c11so2751212ieb.1
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.111.199 with SMTP id ik7mr3856139igb.68.1364847246812;
	Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: harald.schilly@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.45.102 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKaEYh+PPccdHjzd6re4ru2M0fwaO9Ehr7qRYjQABun0qaA3Ow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKaEYh+bzUdLtt7Vg7nyY0UMd1Y3+Sdnqo_+Qjyj_pc6-ZY+6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGG4CB6OJPAQwj=Fjyf5gidfj7D8_KmmX9M4Ut+saG0YQBibjA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKaEYh+PPccdHjzd6re4ru2M0fwaO9Ehr7qRYjQABun0qaA3Ow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Harald Schilly <harald@schil.ly>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 22:13:36 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: F-5TOAeI-K4ltGxmBE_b7tBaflY
Message-ID: <CAGG4CB6Zctb9-cgv9aQywD7J5_Er6LTdbSjFYiY5-STwt2+-jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(harald.schilly[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1UMl7M-0004Pw-66
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin meets the Semantic Web....
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 20:14:16 -0000

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Melvin Carvalho
<melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. bitcoin.org -- logical, but no https and github doesnt let you set mim=
e
> types

This one looks also logical to me. I'm not an semantic web expert, but
from what you wrote I suggest to use a subdomain. Would this be
possible for a schema? E.g. schema.bitcoin.org and it points to an
indepedently run server for the files =85

H