-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I suggest revising these items for clarity (and I'm guessing on the first one)
Calculate hardLimit by examining the coinbase scriptSig votes of the previous 12,000 blocks, and taking the 20th percentile.
A new hardLimit may not increase or decrease by more than 1.2x beyond the prior hardLimit.
to:
The new hardLimit is calculated by sorting the coinbase scriptSig votes of the last 12,000 blocks from lowest to highest and using the vote of the 2400th block.
If the vote of the 2400th block is a change of less than 20%, use it as the new hardLimit. Otherwise, change the hardLimit to be closer to that vote, to either 120% or 80% of the current hardLimit.
I don't understand #5, 75% rule. Shouldn't invalid version 4 blocks always be rejected?
notplato
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV58/5AAoJEL8dSijmIbHt16IH/0jAr3v1HjWW7N1awNxeAABs
GIvOFYuZAcPkZvWZQc4JRAppglqeBfYqWl2gpyywSBK1SXjsY8zdo3t7xAK/IJfB
05hnv1GGutG3dLTzJBEXaPx62SLukepC1pzEH7rlwWvVuE9zcRqVE1eGbBEUjA9c
sGPr0z9BNeLoTbllyl3Jndz9N2Vnd6bBTxRgBlfkm/Y5ovc+GhyKZyX3Pdmj5Pga
E6foOsvqNXQJqPl8WCODsnfPSshyb7YRNFrBB9A+tpjvj4UMc8PxOpL6IX/nJpOt
jlfRoKVw2YBEodvda+9P6S54GlGFazyHhwJ11F5YCNnWW1bKoQrqJU6ofgmyxMM=
=QWra
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
BIP 100 initial public draft: https://github.com/jgarzik/bip100/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawikiEmphasis on "initial" This is a starting point for the usual open source feedback/iteration cycle, not an endpoint that Must Be This Way.
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev