From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B6DFF8 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 01:06:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC2A912C for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 01:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id w75so68799497oie.0 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:06:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZPe0r0PhHFJuMlNgUZ6YmZsFygumfJGodGcb1nXEDs4=; b=qKJUBiCLQ0tEybR8tVH0K9buoje4LO0JuVeOpU6h9qlZuRRIOhEuuWRPI5QS+3ZYI5 V/8Mu9p1SyCQtDppvw4V0X043K09dL1iH+sUt/40Uoj3OChNVKYXtWfDPYJoAK0ZFvOu fqQmqVBojyp/feNmYqFfTIMmqrX931rmUxXf76BDrmvz/ZNp1c7CY5IhWAjBWGhT1iiZ P+WF+nm3d7mekweV7KzkmF0PgWXhk9QyxCsIT1ZCwqOoLhSPXEarjn4UQETtzPJyBPii wTql6dByIujNo1Z1IqrgTxltbOqJZ+P4JTXxDN7ef124fpsDwNyfAQ51eYNy4kDbrMHb bmXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZPe0r0PhHFJuMlNgUZ6YmZsFygumfJGodGcb1nXEDs4=; b=JFFM60hmjBVFvuTBoOS7iPKiF0lkzi2gbcitJbQKEjpGGmnKVdC1s2M8m2Q8HvJD6w g0pEc/i0CI4vohyt6cSWdbCzlX4B9GaeUlqFBxAjaEktbnFM+/jYECbjB/qRB7BRbNay K3mrvVcYrkG0o6QP/NB01XV541CMXXnqJdSkYLZTHqucTRw0zJ9Bly0XaA70hbr6QtVW /n2pJHL2TlIxUF41iywyYe2g9Cf8Gf6wRzrkrWHQeTMZh2pFri9CihOrCEvBnDPm5CaF 7bZsyOV7Lc6GHiplk8e7WfCrRvVngiEaMOrB3Ihk58LWs9oBAdftq6z7g1VsuJh6QnaA A/EA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSAeJ/DXhgg343/7b8ttwf5eWaNOiXVDCMOMGxx8dYvt+AJkHkUebnfABcXPZNp/o9mJ++UQ/55H8wFTg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.197.21 with SMTP id v21mr7144652oif.35.1453597583127; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:06:23 -0800 (PST) Sender: dscotese@gmail.com Received: by 10.60.55.71 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:06:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3B18134A-3E3A-4A98-ADD3-9F5E8600047E@gmail.com> References: <87si1rycux.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <2998879.R5sQRbxZRv@1337h4x0r> <87powvy20w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1736759.DT0dcscznj@1337h4x0r> <20160123205953.GA22494@muck> <3B18134A-3E3A-4A98-ADD3-9F5E8600047E@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:06:23 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZncqYi0L37WRRel4QfVVpArQvbg Message-ID: From: Dave Scotese To: Gavin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 01:08:23 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three Month bitcoin-dev Moderation Review X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 01:06:25 -0000 --001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 The distinction we are making importantly requires that contributors provide readers with another thing to say in favor of something - another thing which is different than "X people support this instead of only X-1 people." Evidence trumps votes. On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gavin via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should > > contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation > > the last +1 gave isn't useful. > > Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either technical > discussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the following > should be encouraged: > > "+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that > would have been prevented if XYZ. > > Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com" > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > -- I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a techie? I own Litmocracy and Meme Racing (in alpha). I'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist which now accepts Bitcoin. I also code for The Dollar Vigilante . "He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satoshi Nakamoto --001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+1
The distinction we are making importantly= requires that contributors provide readers with another thing to say in fa= vor of something - another thing which is different than "X people sup= port this instead of only X-1 people."=C2=A0 Evidence trumps votes.

On Sat, Ja= n 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gavin via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin= -dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfound= ation.org> wrote:
>
> I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should<= br> > contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation
> the last +1 gave isn't useful.

Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either techn= ical discussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the followin= g should be encouraged:

"+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that= would have been prevented if XYZ.

Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com"

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev



--
I like to provide some work at no charge to prove = my value. Do you need a techie?=C2=A0
I own Litmocracy and Meme Racing (in alpha).
I'm the we= bmaster for The V= oluntaryist which now accepts Bitcoin.
I also code for The Dollar Vigilante.
&= quot;He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satos= hi Nakamoto
--001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1--