From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RaV1W-00085i-SX for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:16:10 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.47; envelope-from=timon.elviejo@gmail.com; helo=mail-fx0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1RaV1Q-0005U7-8A for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:16:10 +0000 Received: by faaa20 with SMTP id a20so463104faa.34 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:15:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.0.100 with SMTP id 4mr26289273wid.48.1323792957890; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:15:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.81.79 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:15:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1323731781.42953.YahooMailClassic@web120920.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <201112121841.39864.luke@dashjr.org> <1323736946.58149.YahooMailNeo@web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:15:57 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (timon.elviejo[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1RaV1Q-0005U7-8A Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: [BIP 15] Aliases X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:16:10 -0000 > (6) Settlement system neutral - ie: not bitcoin-centric. ... > Also, a single address could be paid via multiple channels > (conventional financial systems, bitcoin, LETS systems, etc.) > resulting in greater ease of uptake and higher user confidence over > time since published banking information is no longer held hostage to > the assumed longevity, liquidity, legality or other liabilities of an > individual settlement system (such as Bitcoin). I like this part.