public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Richter <richter@cs.rwth-aachen.de>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Storm: escrowed storage and messaging at L2/L3
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:33:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH+=Z+U8sGRtK7TwkGjAQ3yL4WYYnJMJjz9pm+9SOSrHReoerg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x1b18QXzxALwxxp8ehwcB7XORizrw5vOJ9BNXWpXbd2SJgUra-AFIyTgnM_yxKEtCg_frZcz916NLmm-pTsCD4Z7aOFprdQ_W87mHnn8vYg=@protonmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2141 bytes --]

Please see the github issues and the twitter discussion (e.g. here:
https://twitter.com/stefanwouldgo/status/1163801056423403520) for similar
points other people including me have made. At this point I feel there are
quite a few unclear points in the presentation and it is not clear to me if
they can be salvaged.

Am Mi., 21. Aug. 2019 um 09:32 Uhr schrieb ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>:

> Good morning Maxim,
>
> The Deaf Bob Attack
> ===================
>
> It seems to me that Bob can promote the N3 problem to the N2 problem.
>
> Suppose Alice contacts Bob to get the data.
> However, Bob happens to have lost the data in a tragic boating accident.
>
> Now, supposedly what Alice does in this case would be to broadcast the
> HTLC settlement transaction, whose signature was provided by Bob during
> protocol setup.
>
> But this seems unworkable.
>
> * If Bob managed to sign the HTLC settlement transaction, what `SIGHASH`
> flags did Bob sign with?
>   * If it was `SIGHASH_ALL` or `SIGHASH_SINGLE`, then Bob already selected
> the decryption key at setup time.
>   * If it was `SIGHASH_NONE`, then Alice could put any SCRIPT, including
> `<Alice> OP_CHECKSIG`.
>
> If Bob already selected the decryption key at setup time, then Bob can
> ignore Alice.
>
> * If Alice does not publish the HTLC settlement transaction, then Bob will
> eventually enter the N2 state and get the stake+reward.
> * If Alice *does* publish the HTLC settlement transaction, without Bob
> giving the encrypted data, then Bob can just use the hashlock and reveal
> the decryption key.
>   * The decryption key is useless without the encrypted data!
>
> It seems this part is not workable?
> As the decryption key is embedded in the HTLC, Alice cannot get a
> signature from Bob without the decryption key already being selected by Bob
> (and thus already claimable even without any data being returned by Bob).
>
>
> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2798 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-21  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-19 22:08 [bitcoin-dev] Storm: escrowed storage and messaging at L2/L3 Dr Maxim Orlovsky
2019-08-21  4:14 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-08-21  7:32   ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-08-21  9:33     ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2019-08-21 17:04     ` Dr Maxim Orlovsky
2019-08-21 10:51   ` Dr Maxim Orlovsky
2019-08-21 12:48     ` ZmnSCPxj
     [not found]   ` <A733B8A1-2E88-47F4-A6CF-C56C84E8FF9A@pandoracore.com>
2019-08-21 12:12     ` ZmnSCPxj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAH+=Z+U8sGRtK7TwkGjAQ3yL4WYYnJMJjz9pm+9SOSrHReoerg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=richter@cs.rwth-aachen.de \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox