I'm curious to hear the answers to the questions Luke asked earlier. I also read through the documentation and wasn't convinced it was thought out well enough to actually build something on top of, but there's no reason it can't get a number as a work-in-progress.
I hope it does continue to get worked on, though. The lack of response or discussion worries me that it might become an abandoned project.
On Tuesday, July 05, 2016 5:46:36 PM Peter Todd wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 03:53:04AM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:50:26 AM Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > > Author: Flavien Charlon <flavien@charlon.net>
>
> What's the status of this BIP? Will it be assigned?
I was waiting for clarification on the Author thing, but Nicholas hasn't
responded yet. I am unaware of any reason NOT to assign it, and there appear
to be no objections, so let's call it BIP 160.
Luke
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev