From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 340938EC for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 02:15:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qt0-f180.google.com (mail-qt0-f180.google.com [209.85.216.180]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82139198 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 02:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f180.google.com with SMTP id m2so110468321qtd.1 for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:15:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6GJSBrLVuRfiOQytMKGP4bZ5hdahK+6QKuXd/wW1TuI=; b=HY+hmUlrRKuKsPdLIH+0/IogQd/X6CAj9re46owdLOf8JCW4+ETyBiHWZal4ff14nK 7mJmQyaroEFh8T7ncjxlsLZTNilJ/FVjlCJA2/dPwthzCwty99Wrq0NByq9e5Qjd6Osp 2M8+czFj5RREpqDQ2PvAWR0I73Q99YIuKIE+4HEQrCb77lJTlOGGDVZlIbx0THn54gk2 40P953fg6D+Aiq4jXWScR0iRC9NsAr3kJ6JJZwVw1/5IEHjzwE4T9153vFQT+W/I4Bfd yZv7yO79PdUV1t6ZKrvtc3zqyBFiyRhwjAh8NPP6Rgo5WVkPadSpHvGuvqgHYUAicE9M VtWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6GJSBrLVuRfiOQytMKGP4bZ5hdahK+6QKuXd/wW1TuI=; b=kwO3VG07wXhk9RsKSbofH9CleD/qhiii4rxjn1SMqoAZF2i3xY40IgU4NPwZy/Ubue HOzosJxy5AG16r/Sz4RrQrhQt/it6oJLCQmw7AUn2lX1HO/b6smQiNSprEEv25MojrZX dvzjTOt2XE/ZsQpqhR360PnVUBpmVSvP7cvA0R1muwEOxhvjmLE61/kCOxI1qJSGRM4b eYor/1vClRHIUjusqKwBWmvyOajHeYT1/Xct7nqBeaSGQBT22MizK1I5DTQ70gOfcE1T gO5k7WTqWU07DJQv8fhfKOjHB8nnIinyG7njsLDRcUhZpmEHIot7NVPLc853vx8XS+IR DncA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKDfHUmudpxwwZkSUt2xy3Jl+XkXqIEsFONkuK1OqyWDJ/CpBEkev1NVmeGuKa5miD2bsL7lV+h0ce1Dw== X-Received: by 10.237.42.65 with SMTP id c59mr32159452qtd.6.1467771306617; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:15:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201605260353.06939.luke@dashjr.org> <20160705174636.GA24068@fedora-21-dvm> <201607060122.20593.luke@dashjr.org> In-Reply-To: <201607060122.20593.luke@dashjr.org> From: James MacWhyte Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 02:14:57 +0000 Message-ID: To: Luke Dashjr , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion , Peter Todd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114db99057e08e0536ee2312 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Nicolas Dorier Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Open Asset X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 02:15:08 -0000 --001a114db99057e08e0536ee2312 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'm curious to hear the answers to the questions Luke asked earlier. I also read through the documentation and wasn't convinced it was thought out well enough to actually build something on top of, but there's no reason it can't get a number as a work-in-progress. I hope it does continue to get worked on, though. The lack of response or discussion worries me that it might become an abandoned project. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016, 18:32 Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, July 05, 2016 5:46:36 PM Peter Todd wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 03:53:04AM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:50:26 AM Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > > > Author: Flavien Charlon > > > > What's the status of this BIP? Will it be assigned? > > I was waiting for clarification on the Author thing, but Nicholas hasn't > responded yet. I am unaware of any reason NOT to assign it, and there > appear > to be no objections, so let's call it BIP 160. > > Luke > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --001a114db99057e08e0536ee2312 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm curious to hear the answers to the questions Luke as= ked earlier. I also read through the documentation and wasn't convinced= it was thought out well enough to actually build something on top of, but = there's no reason it can't get a number as a work-in-progress.

I hope it does continue to get worked on, though. The lack o= f response or discussion worries me that it might become an abandoned proje= ct.


On Tue, Jul 5, 2016, 18:32 = Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Tuesday, July 05, 2016 5:46:36 PM Peter = Todd wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 03:53:04AM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev = wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:50:26 AM Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-d= ev wrote:
> > >=C2=A0 =C2=A0Author: Flavien Charlon <flavien@charlon.net>
>
> What's the status of this BIP? Will it be assigned?

I was waiting for clarification on the Author thing, but Nicholas hasn'= t
responded yet. I am unaware of any reason NOT to assign it, and there appea= r
to be no objections, so let's call it BIP 160.

Luke
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--001a114db99057e08e0536ee2312--