From: James MacWhyte <macwhyte@gmail.com>
To: Trey Del Bonis <j.delbonis.3@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fortune Cookies to Bitcoin Seed
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 17:05:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH+Axy7YXDC4M0o9WHwaR2k46nWYBtM9VetXyBMx=B9-fxupug@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFUsdzpsoia+1XZs2qzWbanYoOT1g_+43=iGutyKYrCjFCCM5w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 999 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:39 PM Trey Del Bonis via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Keeping 20 around is a little excessive but it gives 390700800 possible
> wallets. So security can be trivially parameterized based on how secure you
> want your wallet to be if someone finds your stash.
>
Mid-level hardware can check 50k addresses per second, which means it would
only take around 2 hours to check all possibilities. So please don't think
this presents any kind of challenge to someone who finds your 20 pieces of
paper and assumes you would only keep them if they are hiding your wallet ;)
Entropy-wise, simply using a strong RNG would provide a better result than
relying on the printing company. Maybe they only print 35 different
combinations and assume people don't eat Chinese food enough to notice?
If it's poor entropy and doesn't really provide any protection against
being brute forced if found, I'm not sure why you would want to go
this route :)
James
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1483 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-06 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 3:48 [bitcoin-dev] Fortune Cookies to Bitcoin Seed Trey Del Bonis
2019-03-06 1:05 ` James MacWhyte [this message]
2019-03-06 1:37 ` Trey Del Bonis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAH+Axy7YXDC4M0o9WHwaR2k46nWYBtM9VetXyBMx=B9-fxupug@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=macwhyte@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=j.delbonis.3@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox