Clearly the primary purpose of BIP0075 is to enshrine a DNSSEC protocol for giving wallet addresses memorable names.
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but if you aren't, I don't think this is an accurate description at all. BIP75 is, at its most simplest, nothing more than an encrypted/encapsulated version of BIP70. All we did was make it safe for people to exchange BIP70 messages through an intermediary.
The only identity information included in BIP75 is the pki_data field, which wasn't even introduced in BIP75--it was already in BIP70. I'm guessing Peter would also have us remove BIP70 altogether?