Hi Thread,

This may not be the most practical information, but there actually did exist an almost perfect analogy for Bitcoin addresses from the ancient world: From wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulla_(seal)

"Transactions for trading needed to be accounted for efficiently, so the clay tokens were placed in a clay ball (bulla), which helped with dishonesty and kept all the tokens together. In order to account for the tokens, the bulla would have to be crushed to reveal their content. This introduced the idea of impressing the token onto the wet bulla before it dried, to insure trust that the tokens hadn't been tampered with and for anyone to know what exactly was in the bulla without having to break it."

You could only use the bulla once because it had to be destroyed in order to get the tokens out! I think there are even examples of bulla with a kind of "signature" on them (an imprint with the seal of a noble family etc).

"send me a Bitcoin bulla" has a nice ring to it!

Sincerely,

LL





On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:44 AM Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
* Sorry if this mail was sent multiple times, my E-Mail client went crazy *

Thanks for all your feedback.
I came to the decision to write a BIP for this, even if it might not be
implemented by many wallets, a standardization is never wrong and this
would be the first step in the correct direction for better on-chain
privacy.

However currently we still need a good term for the 'address' replacement.

The current suggestions are:
* Invoice ID
* Payment Token
* Bitcoin invoice (address)
* Bitcoin invoice (path)

Because of the LN term invoice I really like the term 'Bitcoin Invoice'
by Chris Belcher.

So how do find a consensus about these terms?

Greetings
Emil Engler
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev