To my understanding it is purely software thing. It cannot be detected from outside if miner uses this improvement or not. So patenting it is worthless.slushOn Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Mustafa Al-Bassam via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:Alternatively scenario: it will cause a sudden increase of Bitcoin mines in countries where the algorithm is not patented, possibly causing a geographical decentralization of miners from countries that already have a lot of miners like China (if it is patented in China).
On 01/04/16 10:00, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:41:40PM -0700, Timo Hanke via bitcoin-dev wrote:Hi. I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here: http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdfWhat steps are you going to take to make sure that this improvement is available to all ASIC designers/mfgs on a equal opportunity basis? The fact that you've chosen to patent this improvement could be a centralization concern depending on the licensing model used. For example, one could imagine a licensing model that gave one manufacture exclusive rights.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev