From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49B5F6D for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:54:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com (mail-lj1-f195.google.com [209.85.208.195]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 657B9716 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id l15-v6so1888127lji.6 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 07:54:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=clarkmoody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jQ7Glx8pvuDxMfhpS+90vvAJcfElFlzl76RlVelzi5g=; b=LOot1m5e8Mr+v9wOSJUd8Hk6f4GDaEhvuqNG4O9LrPQoSW5UWTIf6sZWPYPa6m/vcL IJAQhPfrB5N12Mo1b8Typy3ojey+NHjJPPhJFZbHkZ9WosAnL61Ont27TqE7UrtEK3/P OIkLSgf6yuNmiP6kkutjheRZDf/GsnVKWTbQvHdDnJtwZk3Ln4yH9zzg5OBPCnZO1UN5 juspiLj7hSJ8Q9bxrznxmQ1Npkj7JHfTiuNreg6dD092oQi4fLUt6akpZP+4rnsavhuu AkOmGwyzOgt/ZHKDLYkOV4jCuSim/OIZ1bLW5jL75m4GRKsYUTZxiTCaZOtHb1gzu7zS vhCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jQ7Glx8pvuDxMfhpS+90vvAJcfElFlzl76RlVelzi5g=; b=QC7MdFwA5b7istZjmXis1V02BGfPwCGSh0e+W3WZBEJXJnGGs+8elrfujmE6k0EPf8 QyFTXu11oFE2ZE1OJGf3sMonIqB2CbA2m5aekLZjysP3CDf9lQvb8ru7CKilao6Z2VRc 7lVQfzU8ajrgfoB/HzXWMAK3YgPQKeWrgbLn18CoqqWmIx5eoiAP/+AlyEKkXlmwoBaN oSfmjKn4cVI5zc6VKQq+AkPf9TBi3wBZvIt4gaSd3Th83eZOAj4dBYyd2kfKj4fFpOW2 1ErCA6QNnRMFalVUahes+tUVXCdh7z6/DNR6mis7H/KJYh98LJv2Bb32vdi9bWkwABQp n2qg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51A1pqpS5lxJzFOCuI3KIhf/q/Y/sDou1MBDZ2olqjsRHOVQDLTg 2Yc+6/KeoOJqPKE9vUvsWe6pcDiONBUd0sJjV68NCQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdboQZyOAlu3RDcOKDTg6sB6lNMgf1B8SdPCWmyg02BIdhfiOGQGNL/6P8fnv6vVcs1nsQI4IHLRx6fHy8KXKvs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8957:: with SMTP id b23-v6mr1776262ljk.50.1536764083441; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 07:54:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5b787d19.1c69fb81.e0628.771a@mx.google.com> <5b98b2e7.1c69fb81.2a827.102b@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <5b98b2e7.1c69fb81.2a827.102b@mx.google.com> From: Clark Moody Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:54:15 -0500 Message-ID: To: damgaard.martin@gmail.com, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004c16e00575adc5f3" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:23:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Suggestion for a universal bitcoin value scale X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:54:46 -0000 --0000000000004c16e00575adc5f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" This is the sort of thing I expect to emerge from the places that use Bitcoin "on the street." We should be watching how local wallet software displays bitcoin amounts, letting the standards write themselves over time. The units debate (bits, millibits, etc) has been going on nearly as long as I've known about Bitcoin and yet most tools display standard bitcoin amounts (1 unit = 1e8 satoshi). -Clark On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:41 AM Martin Damgaard via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > A very good point. I have realized the immature nature of my suggestion > due to this and a number of other good remarks, and will like to retract > the initial suggestion. > > Thank you and all the best > > Martin Damgaard > > > > *Fra: *Karl-Johan Alm > *Sendt: *12. september 2018 08:14 > *Til: *damgaard.martin@gmail.com; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion > > *Emne: *Re: [bitcoin-dev] Suggestion for a universal bitcoin value scale > > > > A potential problem is that it would be a new attack vector to simply > > color something to appear as e.g. 10x more than it really is, if > > everyone started using this system. > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 5:27 AM Martin Damgaard via bitcoin-dev > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > > > > > Here is my humble attempt to make a contribution to the impressive work > that you all are doing. > > > > > > I am unfamiliar with the normal BIP procedures. I have therefore just > tried to follow the example of BIP 176 by Jimmy Song, in order make > something similar. I suggest a universal bitcoin value color scale, for > tackling the same decimal problem, as identified by the BIP 176 proposal. > > > > > > I have attached the document in three different formats (*.rtf, *.pdf > and *.docx) as I do not know your preferred format. I hope you will find my > suggestion useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you and all the best > > > > > > Martin Damgaard > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > bitcoin-dev mailing list > > > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --0000000000004c16e00575adc5f3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is the sort of thing I exp= ect to emerge from the places that use Bitcoin "on the street." W= e should be watching how local wallet software displays bitcoin amounts, le= tting the standards write themselves over time. The units debate (bits, mil= libits, etc) has been going on nearly as long as I've known about Bitco= in and yet most tools display standard bitcoin amounts (1 unit =3D 1e8 sato= shi).


-Clark
=

On Wed, Sep 12, 2= 018 at 8:41 AM Martin Damgaard via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxf= oundation.org> wrote:

A very good point. I have realized the immature nature of my suggesti= on due to this and a number of other good remarks, and will like to retract= the initial suggestion. =C2=A0

Thank you and all the best

Mar= tin Damgaard

=C2=A0

<= p class=3D"MsoNormal" style=3D"border:none;padding:0cm">Fra: Karl-Johan Alm=
Sendt: 12. september 2018 08:14
Til: damgaard.martin@gmail.com= ; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Emne: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Suggest= ion for a universal bitcoin value scale

= =C2=A0

A potential problem is that it = would be a new attack vector to simply

color some= thing to appear as e.g. 10x more than it really is, if

everyone started using this system.

On Sun,= Aug 19, 2018 at 5:27 AM Martin Damgaard via bitcoin-dev

<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

>=C2=A0

> Hi = = bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org

>= =C2=A0

> Here is my humble attempt = to make a contribution to the impressive work that you all are doing.

>=C2=A0

>= ; I am unfamiliar with the normal BIP procedures. I have therefore just tri= ed to follow the example of BIP 176 by Jimmy Song, in order make something = similar. I suggest a universal bitcoin value color scale, for tackling the = same decimal problem, as identified by the BIP 176 proposal.

>=C2=A0

> I have = attached the document in three different formats (*.rtf, *.pdf and *.docx) = as I do not know your preferred format. I hope you will find my suggestion = useful.

>=C2=A0

>=C2=A0

>=C2= =A0

> Thank you and all the best

>=C2=A0

>= Martin Damgaard

>=C2=A0

> _______________________________________________

=

> bitcoin-dev mailing list

> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org

> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo= /bitcoin-dev

=C2=A0

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--0000000000004c16e00575adc5f3--