From: John Carvalho <john@synonym.to>
To: Daniel Lipshitz <daniel@gap600.com>,
bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 09:59:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHTn92wH17Z+p5cFOLpzsVUuTf4-nZc7tOjQr+_xjSU5groa0Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACkWPs_4pjTo50=S86KPEznBs0PU7rd30rBGHq2Q5=6n6hYMgQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1049 bytes --]
Why wasn't this solution put in place back then? Are there problems with
the design?
While I still think there are unhealthy side-effects of Full-RBF (like more
doublespending at unknowing merchants, after years of FSS protection) I
think discussion of this FSS-RBF feature is worth considering.
--
John Carvalho
CEO, Synonym.to <http://synonym.to/>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 8:09 AM Daniel Lipshitz <daniel@gap600.com> wrote:
> Thank you for bringing that to my attention, apologies for not being aware
> of it.
>
> First-seen-safe replace-by-fee as detailed here
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008248.html
> by Peter Todd seems to be a very suitable option and route
> which balances FullRBF while retaining the significant 0-conf use case.
>
> This would seem like a good way forward.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 6:20 AM Yuval Kogman <nothingmuch@woobling.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008248.html
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2618 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-11 20:24 [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case Daniel Lipshitz
2022-12-13 4:20 ` Yuval Kogman
2022-12-13 8:08 ` Daniel Lipshitz
2022-12-13 9:59 ` John Carvalho [this message]
2022-12-13 11:33 ` Daniel Lipshitz
2022-12-13 14:00 ` Lucas Ontivero
2022-12-13 14:08 ` Daniel Lipshitz
2022-12-13 21:41 ` Peter Todd
2022-12-13 21:58 ` Daniel Lipshitz
2022-12-16 21:14 ` Peter Todd
2022-12-18 8:06 ` Daniel Lipshitz
2023-01-13 23:53 ` Peter Todd
2023-01-14 20:15 ` Daniel Lipshitz
2023-01-16 10:19 ` Daniel Lipshitz
2023-01-17 17:07 ` Erik Aronesty
2023-01-17 17:27 ` Daniel Lipshitz
2023-02-04 16:27 ` Peter Todd
2023-02-06 12:08 ` Daniel Lipshitz
2022-12-14 8:12 ` Daniel Lipshitz
2022-12-14 17:41 ` Erik Aronesty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHTn92wH17Z+p5cFOLpzsVUuTf4-nZc7tOjQr+_xjSU5groa0Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=john@synonym.to \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=daniel@gap600.com \
--cc=pete@petertodd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox