-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA512

On 2015-06-16 23:32, Gregory Maxwell wrote:

> Is there any discussion thats been had relating to the BIP-drafts at:

> Fellow Traveler has apparently been waiting 9 months for progress on

> these proposals and I'm trying to find out where the breakdown

> happened. While do not doubt that I am somehow at fault, I can't

> figure out how.

> Searching my email and this list archive for "Base58 Serialization for

> Transaction-Based Color Descriptors" or "Order-based Smart Property

> Coloring" or the draft names bip-ccids, etc. turn up no hits at all.

> I've asked several other people and there list archives show nothing.

The only two proposals we sent to the mailing list were attached to this post:

The rest of the proposals in that respository, as well as those the fork here:

were never submitted because we decided to use alternative identifiers in leiu of BIP numbers to serve as the purpose code in the HD path.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVgLRaAAoJECpf2nDq2eYjw7YQAJYrciEZZeasEJRR7XwZ5AWQ

9e/pz1SV2hoRs7TqHgHoXGINLbG9LwlXFmnoG14z+vwKvheJxlC6gOQCRIRwPfrR

zwuQWyoONHn82XL44ABqjnu0fmeh7egx3FIzsgDUxUgiP5dA0BuQvrT1+DptfJ+p

5sM7ZvRqfZJbek4AHk9Y4kERQYsP4HKgC1W3Acr1In9WPSj5TRtYz7tUK+SFcO+m

A3Ny5dUiAmmf5mfLZiWrEmCG34n+cCJZEU2hlQqH5ZuAHPmeTLuar91MLj/1Xltf

OFlMGhmUPy1alTx8o39nwRjfXIVQLk7/D5YB3gB2CUuXd+sWbY+6LUyniOKtQK3C

EmEDOUFSNm4JV1AmM+ea1HUufCJfkg1VHko4hsIyc1e7ztdECIzPQKAy7DAcu1YS

BhbkxNyaUqoF+J/ggrXhT/r5oVpWsifdj4IEzaMvmOxu+p+hTkzzwitLuyknEBZE

b2KWRMWNOheVpDp7RmrcTPqa4S1N8XcfJazDyigIhl0E/Bjk+pC1SHo7IIEMZMQ+

Fz7JaALd8XK0l7HBvvJnZmYwVLnQyB01B6n7z8eTTAneHhSXxa7Z1aFTkYU8Wp9o

L5nb1K7gJtjBFqhLi3PMLRhARao1Q/CK5bDt9Mb3VMy9jAIr9X9/NcL473cbHtQH

/h91bhkL9bvvkeCl5yQk

=NgfK

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----