I think it would be more akin to bip70. I have a similar proposal, largely already written up around this. I'm very interested in having this for multi signature wallets.

On 14 Sep 2015 8:06 pm, "Arthur - bitcoin-fr.io via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Hi,
I realized that there isn't any way to ask for a signature (or to verify a message) as easily you can do when requesting a payment using a bitcoin URI scheme (BIP0021).
I think a URI scheme to use the signing tools in bitcoin core might be useful, and with a proper consensus it could become available in most bitcoin clients who already support message signing/verifying and payment url (or QRCode) and enable new uses of bitcoin signatures.
A way to gain proper consensus is going through a BIP, so that's why I'm here: to present my idea publicly before going any further (draft BIP and reference implementation).
Some thoughts
 - like BIP0021: "Bitcoin clients MUST NOT act on URIs without getting the user's authorization." so signing requires the user to manually approve the process
 - it could use the same URI scheme than BIP0021 with an additional parameter (ex: signaction=<verify/sign>) or use another one like BIP121 (ex: btcsig:)
PS : I'll also post a topic in "Development & Technical Discussion" section on Bitcointalk
 
--
Arthur Bouquet

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev