From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QlZf3-0005ga-R8 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:54:29 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1QlZf2-0002Pp-Qd for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:54:29 +0000 Received: by yxi19 with SMTP id 19so38748yxi.34 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:54:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.193.15 with SMTP id q15mr5388838ybf.240.1311656063282; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.114.15 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:54:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201107260022.24961.luke@dashjr.org> References: <1311644156.29866.4.camel@Desktop666> <201107260022.24961.luke@dashjr.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:54:23 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rick Wesson To: Luke-Jr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1QlZf2-0002Pp-Qd Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin DNS addresses X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 04:54:29 -0000 > > 1. Right now you practically need a unique Bitcoin address per transaction. I'd like to find ways to alievate this requirement. > 2. DNSSEC is on the edge of becoming illegal in the US. really, pointers please. DHS was a huge funder for DNSSEC asn .mil was the first domain to deploy it. I think you may be miss-informed. > 3. Emails aren't merely domains. correct, I was speaking about an "address" that used the same/simular formatting but did not use the SMTP protocol. -rick > I would propose something like resolving foo@bar.net to a SRV lookup for > _bitcoinaddressresolution._tcp.foo.bar.net, expecting a cert for bar.net, > making a HTTPS request for /bitcoinaddressresolution?foo@bar.net, and also > sending an email to foo@bar.net (the usual way) signed with the keys used for > the transaction. ;) >