personally, if the software works better (less bugs) then btc will be more valuable. offering bounty is orthorginal to finding the right technical lead that will hurd the effort.
On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:20:07 AM John Smith wrote:I'm not sure a few small bounties would justify agreeing to GitHub's steep
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Joel Joonatan Kaartinen
> <joel.kaartinen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps even add a way for anyone add to the bounty attached to a bug on
> > the bug tracker? Also, a listing page for bugs with their bounties might
> > be nice too.
>
> Good idea. I'm not sure if the github bug tracker supports extension
> attributes, but it'd be a great place to add it. Also, people can let know
> that they're already working on a feature using a comment, to prevent
> double work.
demand for potentially unlimited money in their terms of service...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development