From: Zac Greenwood <zachgrw@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, jack <jack@squareup.com>
Cc: Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>, info@bitcoindefensefund.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 15:36:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ4-pEC5tBpXOe_q+62ehAPNvo3aLNL8LK4TBgPDAH20akOeTg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F3DA4333-E4BB-4A3F-B050-AA142465F2C8@squareup.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1122 bytes --]
The name of the fund should ideally unambiguously clarify its scope, i.e.,
Bitcoin & development. So maybe “Bitcoin Developers Community LDF”. Or
perhaps “Bitcoin Technical Community LDF” which nicely abbreviates to
BTCLDF.
Zac
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 19:49, jack via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi Prayank,
>
> > On 13 Jan 2022, at 10:13, Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de> wrote:
> > I had few suggestions and feel free to ignore them if they do not make
> sense:
> >
> > 1.Name of this fund could be anything and 'The Bitcoin Legal Defense
> Fund' can be confusing or misleading for newbies. There is nothing official
> in Bitcoin however people believe things written in news articles and some
> of them might consider it as an official bitcoin legal fund.
>
> Excellent point. Will come up with a better name.
>
> Open to ideas and suggestions on all.
>
> jack
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1835 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-21 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-13 10:13 [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund Prayank
2022-01-13 18:20 ` jack
2022-01-14 13:21 ` Aymeric Vitte
2022-01-14 18:18 ` qmccormick13
2022-01-14 18:34 ` Jeremy
2022-01-21 14:36 ` Zac Greenwood [this message]
2022-01-13 18:28 ` Steve Lee
2022-01-13 18:54 ` Alex Schoof
2022-01-13 19:28 ` Steve Lee
2022-01-13 19:05 ` Jeremy
2022-01-13 20:50 ` Antoine Riard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-12 9:59 SatoshiSingh
2022-01-12 0:13 jack
2022-01-12 0:47 ` René Pickhardt
2022-01-12 1:42 ` Christopher Allen
2022-01-13 19:25 ` Alex Morcos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJ4-pEC5tBpXOe_q+62ehAPNvo3aLNL8LK4TBgPDAH20akOeTg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zachgrw@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=info@bitcoindefensefund.org \
--cc=jack@squareup.com \
--cc=prayank@tutanota.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox