From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bi-directional micropayment channels with CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 08:22:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0NoDU+DOPfubhbVs8_Y92+uGG=mZ2+ruRCXkeULghWVVg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0ZabL2S=UhB2u7en2AfrckPk5CQe0YN-i4eDXQK-LF6A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1579 bytes --]
Mike, Can you be more specific? You reference "original design" without
saying how it was different/better.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
> A limitation on most existing micropayment channel ideas is that payments
>> can only flow in one direction.
>>
>
> It's worth noting that the original protocol as designed by Satoshi did
> not have this limitation. It has evolved this way because of ad-hoc DoS
> fixes over time (btw I'm not saying they were the wrong thing to do, as non
> "ad hoc" solutions are significantly more work). But it seems like
> eventually a different approach to handling DoS attacks based on resource
> prioritisation and scheduling will become needed / implemented, and at that
> point the original design could be safely brought back to life.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
> your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2602 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-09 11:40 [Bitcoin-development] Bi-directional micropayment channels with CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY Nathan Cook
2015-01-09 13:20 ` Mike Hearn
2015-01-09 13:22 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2015-01-09 13:42 ` Mike Hearn
2015-01-09 14:50 ` Gregory Maxwell
2015-01-11 18:56 ` Mike Hearn
2015-01-11 9:16 ` odinn
2015-01-09 13:26 ` Gregory Maxwell
2015-01-11 22:24 ` Peter Todd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJHLa0NoDU+DOPfubhbVs8_Y92+uGG=mZ2+ruRCXkeULghWVVg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jgarzik@bitpay.com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mike@plan99.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox