public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
To: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_EXT_SERVICES and advertising related services
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 07:22:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0NwzLcGcKLyJVFhXoc49CRnSaqYnSbi=Z8FFXWQir0e9A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALxbBHXPCpZ9npacPOgU2q6=xTpcOVi2fJ+C8v93U2Oyuorrgw@mail.gmail.com>

This is not a generic "I run a website!" advertisement feature.
NODE_EXT_SERVICES is tightly focused on services that exist
if-any-only-if a P2P bitcoin node (bitcoind) is reachable via the same
advertised address.

You may usefully create overlay networks of specialized services.



On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Christian Decker
<decker.christian@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wonder whether we actually want to support this kind of advertisement in
> the P2P protocol. We have a working mechanism for protocol extensions in the
> P2P network (service flags) so this is obviously only for services that are
> not P2P extensions, so why have them in there at all?
>
> I'd argue that a parallel network, external to Bitcoin, could take over the
> task of advertising external services.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> --
> Christian Decker
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
>> >>> He wants to use it to advertise services that are not part of the P2P
>> >>> protocol itself, but run on a different port. Reserving services bits
>> >>> for those is not acceptable.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Why not? Does the port matter much?
>> >
>> > Yes. The services bits are for advertising services on the P2P
>> > network. That's not open for discussion.
>>
>> It also wouldn't work. A bit is not enough to find an external service
>> except in the naive case where the advertised service would have a
>> fixed port. Not even bitcoind has a fixed port. So there needs to be a
>> mechanism to find how to connect to the 'external service'. This is
>> provided by the proposed extension.
>>
>> It would in principle be possible to advertise an extra service bit
>> *in addition to* this one, to make it easier to find through the addr
>> mechanism. But it  would be confusing and IMO an abuse of P2P service
>> bits.
>>
>> Wladimir
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
>> search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
>> Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
>> search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
> search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
> Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
> search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>



-- 
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/



  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-08 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-08  3:38 [Bitcoin-development] NODE_EXT_SERVICES and advertising related services Jeff Garzik
2014-08-08  9:45 ` Mike Hearn
2014-08-08  9:56   ` Wladimir
2014-08-08 10:01     ` Mike Hearn
2014-08-08 10:15       ` Wladimir
2014-08-08 10:26         ` Wladimir
2014-08-08 10:41           ` Christian Decker
2014-08-08 11:22             ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2014-08-08 11:33       ` Jeff Garzik
2014-08-08 11:38         ` Mike Hearn
2014-08-08 11:59           ` Wladimir
2014-08-08 12:06             ` Jeff Garzik
2014-08-08 12:11             ` Jeff Garzik
2014-08-08 12:15               ` Wladimir
2014-08-08 12:11             ` Mike Hearn
2014-08-08 12:15               ` Jeff Garzik
2014-08-08 12:16               ` Wladimir
2014-08-08 12:34               ` Wladimir
2014-08-08 13:55                 ` Mike Hearn
2014-08-08 12:04           ` Jeff Garzik
2014-08-08 12:13             ` Mike Hearn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJHLa0NwzLcGcKLyJVFhXoc49CRnSaqYnSbi=Z8FFXWQir0e9A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jgarzik@bitpay.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=decker.christian@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox