From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1W3XK5-0004xZ-Vt for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:44:26 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.172; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com; helo=mail-we0-f172.google.com; Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1W3XK4-0007am-1z for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:44:25 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q58so2365717wes.17 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:44:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=w5FUpFh7rqZx+2690OUEa3Rz3cQDA49yleaWXq55O7k=; b=m4IfP2G/lUyT1bEtZmGGz45diUdAXghmuD2edcJ3Ryd2Lm8AP8ETf2KRiCYlvXFhS/ yjuc3uDE3j/ggvPNpWfWzLAlxGBlfMlkAysXI+LCoOJnkrbGFBYIINU8BXABlixSFSq5 FHTb6DE78pjm1LHGO+FWFfQVAz4M+cB3m3M2ht2QnrCzs89t0M+3jwpjSoo4v/4oX5O9 zSg57aBypZthPvNU8gqr26YE8BZZQm0gPauznVykZKWmv+KXqmS9wd77LJUqxzc0PH6K xZb9EQMiiH63pu2AmztvRfcieOL8ARuKBzL3K2KaqyO9vFsUXK3GSYV8tY7Qp25i4BQf sm7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl92kPUaoXYEkzU4diBEraDl6dVFpeEiYzdA0vgSDxvBBeHdWFkv0VWfs6nH8D0b1OaH9/t MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.182.226 with SMTP id eh2mr4227432wic.36.1389818657706; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:44:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.2.164 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:44:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20140106120338.GA14918@savin> <20140110102037.GB25749@savin> <20140113133746.GI38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> <20140114225321.GT38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:44:17 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Gregory Maxwell Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e016347f065424e04f0085f9d X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1W3XK4-0007am-1z Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:44:26 -0000 --089e016347f065424e04f0085f9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended use/direction. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ben Davenport > wrote: > > But may I suggest we consider changing the name "stealth address" to > > something more neutral? > > ACK. Regardless of the 'political' overtones, I think stealth is a > little cringe-worthy. > > "Private address" would be fine if not for confusion with private-keys. > > "Static address" is perhaps the best in my view. (also helps improve > awareness that normal addresses are intended to be more one-use-ness) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ --089e016347f065424e04f0085f9d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"static address" seems like a reasonable attempt= at describing intended use/direction.



On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Gre= gory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12= :22 PM, Ben Davenport <bendave= nport@gmail.com> wrote:
> But may I suggest we consider changing the name "stealth address&= quot; to
> something more neutral?

ACK. =A0Regardless of the 'political' overtones, I think stea= lth is a
little cringe-worthy.

"Private address" would be fine if not for confusion with private= -keys.

"Static address" is perhaps the best in my view. (also helps impr= ove
awareness that normal addresses are intended to be more one-use-ness)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam= pad/clk?id=3D119420431&iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment



--
Jeff Garzik=
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. =A0 = =A0 =A0https://bitpay.com= /
--089e016347f065424e04f0085f9d--