From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WW4Tm-0005sj-GU for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:48:22 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.170; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com; helo=mail-yk0-f170.google.com; Received: from mail-yk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WW4Tl-0002yJ-PI for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:48:22 +0000 Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 9so2928198ykp.29 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:48:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=soXvZvOGu+YksLUZ0yi/cb5R+zHTpRwYXBJag9Yi6C8=; b=MuewcXU5wIgOirKaHB9yo4EX9lR7PIrku5AFS/6WuaLuTYGInjjLUdatBcZ597nL/G uzsb+YtU7EEEwHjjz9UDpoQIF5Hrdm6BA955jYpWZfgGUbyg93K8NxwYDnrZpuSx/I7t OdF3YKiXpFjSpYC8B/zwgYQuF16g/SGZKxEWJitUCcj+mlsOcaVvRQGl4jcONZn0hkHF tXn7qNmHaQlqieoShpHRDKSys0nTajvDnvlWOANG59CozvabzyPVzBX3+KpwpohXHKU2 BvkO4sEf37US3rJc5+raa8v+Dv7exd5bYXEE+a/eU2eyQXP6CnX5XXGYjgXwMCGo9dI6 fheg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkj2kvcVwp2WDZpWeGOTxuBYwOkb5mOEUwyXEt9S5WZrKJYSKUQaPTjpGvrnHxKHmpBE64N X-Received: by 10.236.156.65 with SMTP id l41mr17274458yhk.9.1396619296234; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:48:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.162.214 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 06:47:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jeff Garzik Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:47:56 -0400 Message-ID: To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WW4Tl-0002yJ-PI Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Draft BIP for seamless website authentication using Bitcoin address X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:48:22 -0000 On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: > These are the kinds of problems that crop up when you mix together two > different things: the act of paying, and the act of identifying yourself. This is precisely why SINs use a different version byte from bitcoin addresses. There should never be any confusion between money/payments and identity. -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/