From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1W3ZYd-0002Ys-Fc for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:07:35 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com designates 209.85.212.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.179; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com; helo=mail-wi0-f179.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1W3ZYc-0006VW-I0 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:07:35 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hr1so2912227wib.12 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:07:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3xluf5BkeMjvYcw/tUkpkyYRpU0zOpcGedekJtxp6CI=; b=UvSNJGYYtKf3vICcTkGtcLX2RdiIZoIY4Vg3oENzg2ru6qHEPmUfnlKzI3/k75C3E+ mGdc+zgjrj04uqCvoW4LmGTi37OSvnGr4YcwbVfMJvEcDJOHd3HJH+JP+BnNs0ned1BF m6lWC0LIoLNnxBFeXOq6JjuMOsAIyKHKvq7A64K+U6FxncgW9a+49CoDxfwZbVFEh9lb qf4aKnIF0PsUPtUQ1g2NV9k7cBfSl9GWruEsmYvyOcpBawiiW63VKJRs3q0Qbs0DierD H4INaHkda1LLF1YT3qy5+3fwlIcgOw1AnHk+Its//HsOBd5RoDKTG42fo3OmaHYg6ymG Lg+g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnx/yLFHfmtqDOWLrJ2NZ/dVnOnLtmfo6MU+MTjbQbe7DgIgpRUHL2PvC//7a7PpBJMhS65 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.79.106 with SMTP id i10mr4742437wix.23.1389827248293; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.2.164 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:07:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140115230423.GU38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> References: <20140113133746.GI38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> <20140114225321.GT38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> <20140115230423.GU38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:07:28 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Roy Badami Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1W3ZYc-0006VW-I0 Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:07:35 -0000 "Routing address" is pretty good too. Unsure whether the synergy and familiarity with bank routing numbers improves the situation, or not... On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Roy Badami wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended >> use/direction. > > ...as opposed to an address configured by DHCP? > > More seriously, I don't think a typical user will understand anything from > the phrase "static address". But it is a neutral name, and it is shorter > than "address-of-a-type-for-which-reuse-is-not-deprecated". :-) > > -roy -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/