Re: [Bitcoin-development] Deprecating "midstate" in getwork?

[John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1358 bytes --]

Nils,

Sounds good. I'm also doubtful of depending on two crypto libraries when
OpenSSL does perfectly well.

However, losing compatibility with miners is not very nice. Is there really
not a way to compute midstate with OpenSSL?

JS

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Nils Schneider <nils@nilsschneider.net>wrote:

> Hey,
>
> I'd like to simplify the internal reference miner and remove all
> dependencies on cryptopp (it's the only place we use cryptopp instead of
> OpenSSL).
>
> Unfortunately, cryptopp is also used to calculate getwork "midstate".
> This field is redundant and the miner could easily calculate it from the
> blockheader so I'd like to remove it.
>
> Any thoughts? Where should such a change should be announced so all
> miners can be upgraded?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1935 bytes --]