From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TVpl2-0007B2-UG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:28:24 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1TVpl2-0008DR-2N for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:28:24 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c13so1299495ieb.34 for ; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:28:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=Qor1XmzQFxvLqj5DSdX4GdSwpL14+HyARkYnfYEXqQQ=; b=ZjTd7BasyIz8Io2iAU+MhrZc7XzFaNv6kgKaM4ZYNJgCL54rTwRm/gB8JCxmcFAvq3 trOCa6D9XiZtTCvHYYdgk3Dxvlto3Ibr5lw94/tUsZAlDbRGNiUzvV7bH48is5gSmWPj pbtUKXFUTwjYBFX+G3Y6qfhldLjUS2CpC3VZJXYbnC44cdC+b7EbPk0v5AWBUGXa+SRC rgFJRo9Z6ivrCL8Gdg54/C3H1iQPQihTH9wY1aR0t8mMh6+fQlwhMjJxQxexLjc/Ld0g oOyikM8WgodhrmO0+mGPcfp9UMVp9+KtozXOHfozIHoX7XOyf+mNLLVc90jjYgN56IZe sXTw== Received: by 10.50.36.200 with SMTP id s8mr14255085igj.25.1352231813478; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:56:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: marek@palatinus.cz Received: by 10.64.51.103 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:56:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201211061913.35016.luke@dashjr.org> References: <201211061913.35016.luke@dashjr.org> From: slush Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:56:23 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UZhD4qCEpcrUX95ccGQdJcYe_Yc Message-ID: To: Luke-Jr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQndhwv/hweNzh7ax5PKcGtO5c2ZtWcDeeea5UtXwaelqfUE0IbFbr+1NegW87bkFK99s9Jz X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (slush[at]centrum.cz) 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1TVpl2-0008DR-2N Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] IRC meeting agenda, 18:00 UTC Thursday X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:28:25 -0000 --14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr wrote: > But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, is encouraging > wider > community participation. It's not about BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular proposals. > The stratum mining mess seems to be a direct result There's no mess with stratum mining, except in your head. There's no requirement to have BIP for everything what people do. Stratum is NOT related to bitcoin protocol or bitcoin implementation, it is just custom, pooled-mining extension and bitcoin network doesn't need to know about Stratum existence at all. > and lack of any peer review/contribution toward the stratum protocol. There have been peer review of the protocol. You wanted to say "I was not invited to do peer review", right? Please don't start it AGAIN and stop bashing Stratum in your posts, at least in bitcoin-dev mailing list. I promised to write BIP draft for Stratum, I proposed and implemented get_transactions method to allow Stratum jobs inspection. What more do you want, seriously? I'm soo tired by you, Luke. slush P.S. I'm sorry that other developers had to read such posts. I'll try to sit on my hands next time. --14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@das= hjr.org> wrote:
But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, = is encouraging wider
community participation.

It's not about= BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular proposals.
=A0
The stratum mining mess seems to be a direct result

There's no mess with stratum mining, except in your head. Ther= e's no requirement to have BIP for everything what people do. Stratum i= s NOT related to bitcoin protocol or bitcoin implementation, it is just cus= tom, pooled-mining extension and bitcoin network doesn't need to know a= bout Stratum existence at all.
=A0
and lack of any peer review/co= ntribution toward=A0the stratum protocol.

T= here have been peer review of the protocol. You wanted to say "I was n= ot invited to do peer review", right?

Please don't start it AGAIN and stop bashing Stratu= m in your posts, at least in bitcoin-dev mailing list.

=
I promised to write BIP draft for Stratum, I proposed and implemented = get_transactions method to allow Stratum jobs inspection. What more do you = want, seriously?=A0I'm soo tired by you, Luke.

slush

P.S. I'm sorry that = other developers had to read such posts. I'll try to sit on my hands ne= xt time.
--14dae9340827e57b2404cdd900b6--