From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B608D932 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:44:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0721AD for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id o80so23638801wme.1 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:44:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=palatinus-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pUnWG+Tft37ek4NC28OaRcalnX5aTJ9BpRR539Mlxsc=; b=bTY736KQK/zkz2fSB5mx6F5p45aMWi4xU7pCWRoIhuTFygzL9WWomEQC9SWA7dtVVj 5xTq+5QkBbY6L7zQLqj9/pt4Nfx4+27nwlZTVNs3sUz6ILEzNc4tXkeWThvP0ciZOh6v 1VH3NZnpLGX4kcIjqBEtPkwDJkPCwgiovzNbVByZBFEXgujp8AkegttctVnOCNthttJ2 rGdeZgl6PIa7yYMSbGx0rLEkgsVfCC5juBQ9+MSYbmDFKo6pCoakx5Wh2yI5cgcpNgDP fSLMnDhrLA29r8noETQehyZYx3M36cMda4+z8bmn7Z5jbtITKvQ59z5xDXR4YS6P1lu4 852Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pUnWG+Tft37ek4NC28OaRcalnX5aTJ9BpRR539Mlxsc=; b=h9OXDoB4ZkvohVuLYYU5r8KaCwWfUwcDdNncSv8ti1f4jBc5y7L3mJaEfBiuYS4P4H Bp2OW8v9RmZa8GWz4CkdHpgd1aorc0bFPB1vMgK0mHtPY2h8IVmRm3ozhgOXEfH11Hh1 0oasN1oW0jAUnDS2zDHDnANS7RAVPe4GpXuNKLcTBqpr/tCXseMiutY6N8QT+8PEXP+z YBUtbrQLb11Yls0l3dWgG4R7lrp3IBDh7GGToB5/PGLHlQKE5UtUJ4pGpl6frvPp0CJg mN/+5jVbZjbIOVk7Yr1CIPNI4mjXCjC8FsIDR6UKftooYukOeixubwXoQhHf5eSKjxvj 31yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous3x+qOHrpwEsGv0QSyDIdX4ebUdTo7n+IDQRRiLF4yKXCI/U1XKjTPs+bqxuJ0P2hltNO2y40t4U0vcw== X-Received: by 10.28.197.129 with SMTP id v123mr1608581wmf.70.1471513443857; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:44:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.43.135 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:43:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57B58149.8000200@jonasschnelli.ch> References: <57B31EBC.1030806@jonasschnelli.ch> <9c8dd0e5-e333-90c8-965f-10fb29d875a5@thomaskerin.io> <57B4113E.4010502@jonasschnelli.ch> <57B44BCB.3010400@jonasschnelli.ch> <57B55B8C.1070001@jonasschnelli.ch> <57B58149.8000200@jonasschnelli.ch> From: Marek Palatinus Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:43:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: Jonas Schnelli Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardware Wallet Standard X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:44:06 -0000 --94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Jonas Schnelli wrote: > I agree that BIP70 is a mess (including the bitcoin:// additions). The > proposed URI scheme would be completely different. This reminds me https://xkcd.com/927/ I have some experience with hardware wallet development and its integration and I know it's a mess. But it is too early to define such rigid standards yet. Also, TREZOR concept (device as a server and the primary source of workflow management) goes directly against your proposal of wallet software as an workflow manager. So it is clear NACK for me. slush --94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --94eb2c0d4b761a947c053a556c16--