From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] signature abstraction
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:31:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJowKgJufpqULUAnqiaXC4G9wGUUXL5Lwjo+DHjv1HyGksG-gA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 534 bytes --]
was thinking it might be possible to create a protocol for signatures where
some bounded elliptic curve parameters are in the script, allowing the
efficient verification of a broad range of elliptic curves schnorr
signatures... rather than a fixed curve
has anyone proposed this sort of thing before?
seems like it could allow higher bitness, broad hsm compatibility, and a
"decentralization and competitiveness" of security parameters for different
environments
would be useful to me, but not sure how many people care about this
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 635 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2022-06-03 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJowKgJufpqULUAnqiaXC4G9wGUUXL5Lwjo+DHjv1HyGksG-gA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=erik@q32.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox