From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9075AB8A for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:50:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qk0-f182.google.com (mail-qk0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D61019C for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id h67so107971080qke.0 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:50:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=TiC9TkqZd4KH7mrEBi91o4DVkQoQUu8osqbQR6CzxA0=; b=tMqe1lhwDrczMkYVeuVRNdpEtdjrLpGVRgoOZWTL+AgaWLV3Gc2MwKnsmk0Jt7fIP9 bSFWVTk6KUOtMzYjAILMgaZzJVKBb9mVngHCO7vYHVjq7AueUKgz6BjN5Hg4mLTeuLjf YR0/VUF7RHSMS7USeYrBAtHMsymW3t6icN+ZunNasQop9g58Tv3RL1c9XmaVVxHTxwyi zfAJqGkqtDKOyR8N9+jOkkQCOdPWR61TALkfiuH8wQ9Dr3pwY/KOUMHjjW68c0CC8TG/ Hhity+jBywTX6C0bjP3sEDsapWUGwvRZJfNxSDthQ8lj0whCt1H29+/++cRjCfFlMpOz zeSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TiC9TkqZd4KH7mrEBi91o4DVkQoQUu8osqbQR6CzxA0=; b=acW596WhoRdRLor/mbBnqksBr3FJLHMw9CgPUkhVdZ8EyDMU9upehX3JPlsX0N7syr Cx9hh05XFIEeliPSz4+eVM7kFBSeK/Ah7AO4C+CLZtJhH4Cbnd+XE/D/XmSDC0Wx0XEa LBZVkVOy9CLzshyTBWoWka+m7jGEcuUj+jdTnibSrBfrf7sNv1qLbI2V+8/GG2LHcJ19 28rrSvW0q+xj6Shczm51V46zMUD08pvftxzRMl+AkvEarox++ORj+4B1gf/4L06zqGkL 1zEuSGEX+Njz8hyZW0k4j3eYfRNKCGto10yHs+KdmrySJAYOPWWuubgwP+tTsFL+GHY+ sbMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4Z8LbAyixSf9m+/wLfhmTJUpP8gTyYVal3D4/wwdq4NUtBVlgc 5EB6KhvCuysoI1OWaoJORUMTgaP68qQk X-Received: by 10.55.98.145 with SMTP id w139mr9732885qkb.197.1492444253492; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:50:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: earonesty@gmail.com Received: by 10.200.0.146 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:50:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.200.0.146 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 08:50:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Erik Aronesty Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:50:51 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hVhaXRWS0O-RONsTjI1L3esWlJk Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0558fe939a9c054d5ec102 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:51:18 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Transaction signalling X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:50:55 -0000 --94eb2c0558fe939a9c054d5ec102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 If users added a signal to OP_RETURN, might it be possible to tag all validated input addresses with that signal. Then a node can activate a new feature after the percentage of tagged input addresses reaches a certain level within a certain period of time? This could be used in addition to a flag day to trigger activation of a feature with some reassurance of user uptake. --94eb2c0558fe939a9c054d5ec102 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If users added a signal to OP_RETURN, might it be possibl= e to tag all validated input addresses with that signal.
<= br>
Then a node can activate a new feature after the= percentage of tagged input addresses reaches a certain level within a cert= ain period of time?

This= could be used in addition to a flag day to trigger activation of a feature= with some reassurance of user uptake.




=




--94eb2c0558fe939a9c054d5ec102--