From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CB51BCF for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:44:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com (mail-lf0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48998186 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id a6so27145270lfa.0 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:44:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=O58JjyjiQ3j+5Ky/Q91qX02DghZCOGiVhsCHCGQFuL4=; b=MhYGbHABvukUuqmZbzDObrZ+DrB7T7cgXBQo/RPgYGxq52myiQlzFVH3yzxxJIjF3c 8ULxsQ90UxfreCjJ1gZQKbZd7WxfeGwnipW2tlraodx+mOFBEHMo7jn5wL6oOBWWxyVR /LUAVq3pAatW/y5FBxkxqcRnHZZ/fVwJZceTJ+mNZ3A9hDfgOitc7v4BNdycljKjZ0tY 8e8VubBlO6GRT0lSARwZtW8oBQiJ4qEqOlPWjb1iSg8lTEUy5BVF+k49ckzeBNc7J2P9 pAke3AB2SyAOSupyzC5PYaRk6LpwDBG4bcwqYSrIut5/hpKPcP2W+rabFRdWIeZffgTC FaOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O58JjyjiQ3j+5Ky/Q91qX02DghZCOGiVhsCHCGQFuL4=; b=jlPZCdm3Wpv2WsV40G0GwYps+q/dRU65YEdqmLhCpIOoyxykjK9WWHcNpGZKS8PhCn 40Cts0lbO38W083bv5GYxw35tV08eaRAx1T6MPxz7ZToeIOYT8A0IQZD79WM7clRNRaS deiuIDi+LCaCCWKEIJLkwNty46+PVJGzyrnHJ8U7N9IEPcClA9AganbERkvDE+XcW2a1 r0g239NHemtzifU3t1SePkn2shh7vwLrjdYrMv/TrmnAlWC0V75rATjhwv7zolEOosln 2dinK2qJXrXUzUoEIX/82OnwbIdktM7vcciK8o7BgWnT5BiB0CYbehExXYiqMkLe13jd /Iuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H35pP+TP6RCYOeZjeyklJ03NkEc25U8mgL6TffLJhygLd4EGMU2S/rx+FCe6cHjorQSbACvXeYYKaSCEg== X-Received: by 10.25.193.70 with SMTP id r67mr3577450lff.66.1489711467771; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:44:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: earonesty@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.160.203 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:44:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Erik Aronesty Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 20:44:27 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -TbzYF7rCngLsDXuaArJ4M3eQgY Message-ID: To: Alphonse Pace Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0c88f2dabd91054ae27a86 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:46:42 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Quadratic hashing solution for a post-segwit hard fork X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:44:31 -0000 --94eb2c0c88f2dabd91054ae27a86 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yeah, it does make things harder, and it's easy enough to soft fork to handle arbitrary opt-in protocol improvements, new much larger block sizes, whatever you want. Even OK to migrate to a new system by not allowing old->old or new->old transactions. --94eb2c0c88f2dabd91054ae27a86 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yeah, it does make things harder, and it's easy enough= to soft fork to handle arbitrary opt-in protocol improvements, new much la= rger block sizes, whatever you want. =C2=A0 Even OK to migrate to a new sys= tem by not allowing old->old or new->old transactions. =C2=A0 =C2=A0<= br>

--94eb2c0c88f2dabd91054ae27a86--