From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Multiparty signatures
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 10:19:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJowKgLrSe77sqO2iB7mYboo_HW=YjO4=AFdv7L5FUi2vygMiQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 822 bytes --]
To save space, start with the wiki terminology on schnorr sigs.
Consider changing the "e" term in the schnorr algorithm to hash of message
(elligator style) to the power of r, rather than using concatenation.
I don't think this changes the security. An attacker would need to know k
to either way to compromise the private key.
This would allow m of n devices to sign a transaction without any of them
knowing a private key at all.
IE: each device can roll a random number as a share and the interpolation
of that is the private key.
The public shares can be broadcast and combines. And signature shares can
be broadcast and combined.
The net result of this is it really possible for an arbitrary set of
devices to create a perfectly secure public-private key pair set.
At no point was the private key anywhere.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1271 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-08 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-08 14:19 Erik Aronesty [this message]
2018-07-08 15:16 ` [bitcoin-dev] Multiparty signatures Tim Ruffing
2018-07-08 18:23 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-08 21:01 ` Gregory Maxwell
2018-07-09 0:27 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-09 2:33 ` Pieter Wuille
2018-07-09 4:29 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-09 4:39 ` Pieter Wuille
[not found] ` <CAJowKg+=7nS4gNmtc8a4-2cu1uCOPqxjfchFwDVqUciKNMUYWQ@mail.gmail.com>
2018-07-09 15:02 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-09 15:57 ` Dan Robinson
2018-07-09 15:59 ` Gregory Maxwell
2018-07-09 16:33 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-09 16:58 ` Gregory Maxwell
2018-07-09 17:59 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-10 11:46 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-11 10:35 ` Adam Back
2018-07-11 14:45 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-19 12:16 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-19 12:24 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-19 13:11 ` Russell O'Connor
2018-07-20 16:25 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-20 17:34 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-20 20:18 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-26 2:05 ` Erik Aronesty
2018-07-09 16:21 ` Gregory Maxwell
2018-07-09 2:29 ` Pieter Wuille
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJowKgLrSe77sqO2iB7mYboo_HW=YjO4=AFdv7L5FUi2vygMiQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=erik@q32.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox