From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 585D32C for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 15:23:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com (mail-lf0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6636BA for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 15:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f42.google.com with SMTP id a4-v6so29335911lff.5 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:23:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=BGjfOPoIWOZckZ6bcbNCYsJROGfXRC0I4vyalqtxp/I=; b=N4AgWRq+Bb7VumSjgjiY1AoqAVjSdqerY6h8E4Ur9jPRaGQtj0FWiQZKihTDcoTVBk RPzy4xpMAn+uJ+syptSJP/uhxV57MQvSbcZKR7WNCL7kLMuI0KxR2PmI/cGRjZ1iKl4R 7erZ8C2AvtFSKJrumgviGZcGqOnSwAv8zs82A9tAgkTFuj/F/D3JJGDiL4nF7o02tSjR hfxDTHPjTMM23Ed3HIPjmk7eWT5a1fcvDCheNcCGhw4E9hxpHx/LY2VvGNf7sKpw29vN zgKQWOn/IZuwM8B1cwyHLL1+tfueqbp6jy4ixcn5DeJupbX8MWWGtIfzaFj6Zv61NMSI lA8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BGjfOPoIWOZckZ6bcbNCYsJROGfXRC0I4vyalqtxp/I=; b=Lb446hxA03v0PX1OoPdLhOX4FpGM2bq4F9znTXrReO16OR7alwDC/JD+Grkrj5RX/6 w7YkiEckTtmapFcFLtlI9aAVrnKKFpjP51l1zleHLztCXs6XJ1o5bkyiv9olrPmuGxVZ UHsP4h55UamguqwN9g28bPS4tAaJwLqowUE2VGNtc+68ishnMle80ZqMwjgHeWHzbnGI Vbp2VD+WdxY06eOTX36c2+7Hzyd5xxIq4AtnDhl9LUQ5oSPH3908Y/HuoBJq0LDN4i4G CfY+nNkSuDD83PMo546BeIstpa99ko7Twoq+tnhpKaeRBMsNXZPMdiflq+6ECjsrEt03 /CbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGSWaEM8VPTwu+bCdR+lnmowSBxDjwSJ5pKBNUp3nYvOagQc9OZ 8ld+10M7jGYwh5oq+IuFve85eTu99YeSjW3AlQV60EK0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcM6sTcagN0I7vWMiPluc2xFmEn8FJCDPWfA3urDDLzSWWvyBvZvbRQHlKYwsmv2nrOR5an8mWgXdGz8WT7JB0= X-Received: by 2002:a19:ce51:: with SMTP id e78-v6mr8215345lfg.99.1531581824634; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:23:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: famonid@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a19:eb44:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:23:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1531576139.518511.1440639640.45D7AAB0@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1531576139.518511.1440639640.45D7AAB0@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Marco Falke Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:23:43 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tKTGKSOOk2RTS36Ex119KHKnMqY Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] v0.16.1 test_bitcoin fails on Deian 9 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 15:23:47 -0000 Hi, and thanks for the detailed issue report. This was a known issue in test code that is only compiled when debugging. It will be fixed in the upcoming 0.16.2 and 0.17.0 releases. If you see any further issues, note that we track technical issues related to the Bitcoin Core code base on our issue tracker: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/new Marco On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Shigeya Suzuki via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hi, > > I observed strange result when running src/test/test_bitcoin on Debian 9. > > I tested with the following platforms: > > 1) OS X High Sierra 10.13.6 with > ./configiure --enable-debug > > 2) Debian 9 (with latest packages) with > ./configure --enable-debug --disable-wallet --without-gui > > 3) Ubuntu 16.04 with: > ./configure --with-debug --disable-wallet > > strangely, configuration 2 cause core dump but others not: > > Running 264 test cases... > unknown location(0): fatal error: in "validation_block_tests/processnewblock_signals_ordering": memory access violation at address: 0x00000000: no mapping at fault address > zsh: segmentation fault ./test_bitcoin > > I guess it is due to toolchain differences. > > Any thoughts? > > Shigeya Suzuki > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev